Search for: "Roberts v. State" Results 8901 - 8920 of 17,007
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2014, 7:44 am by Bruce Ackerman
No serious originalist – of whatever variety – can be satisfied with Chief Justice Roberts’ treatment of the key constitutional issues. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 9:38 am by WSLL
If you need assistance in putting together a citation from this, or any future opinion using the Universal Citation form, please contact the Wyoming State Law Library and we will provide any needed assistance]Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme CourtCase Name: Holiday v. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
” At The George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket blog, Suja Thomas writes that in Timbs v. [read post]
Chief Justice Roberts believed that the district court properly followed the governing standard under Thornburg v. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 2:19 pm by CSL Library News
The first case to be tried under the new law was United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2024, 4:48 am by Donald Dinnie
It is the principle upon which Bekker NO [Bekker NO v Total South Africa (Pty) Ltd 1990(3) SA 159 (T) at 170G0H] was decided, and, more recently, Masstores (Pty) Ltd v Murray & Roberts (Pty) Ltd [Masstores (Pty) Ltd v Murray & Roberts (Pty) Ltd 2008 (6) SA 654 (SCA)] was based on the same logic. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 6:30 am by Richard Primus
  Schwartz’s fellow travelers in that literature include John Mikhail, Robert Reinstein, and, well, me. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 3:04 pm by John Floyd
United States, the Chief Justice John Roberts-led U.S. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The evolution of New York’s whistle blower laws protecting public officers and employees Castro v City of New York, 2016 NY Slip Op 05615, Appellate Division, First DepartmentIn his notice of claim dated November 17, 2012, Robert J. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 11:40 am
United States (on circuits courts' power to enhance criminal sentences sua sponte)No. 06-7517, Irizarry v. [read post]