Search for: "United States v. California"
Results 8901 - 8920
of 13,840
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2012, 10:35 am
The court certified a class for purposes of settlement of “[a]ll current and former ‘Blockbuster’ members in the United States and its territories and possessions” and preliminarily approved the settlement agreement. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 10:13 am
The United States Supreme Court has a long line of cases addressing cities and states that penalize speech in public places. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 10:00 am
In 2009 in the state of California, a three-judge panel found that overcrowding in state prisons has created significant health risks. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 1:26 pm
One year later, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 10:14 am
See Sparks v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 7:14 am
The Department of Justice announced that the United States has partially intervened in a qui tam action pending in the Northern District of California. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 12:00 am
(credit for 1959 front page) On this day in ... ... 1962 (50 years ago today), a woman was executed for the last time in California's history -- she was also the last woman to be executed in the United States before the de facto moratorium put in place by the decision in Furman v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 9:59 pm
And maybe he is.But it was John Roberts, no fan of my clients, who wrote this a couple of years ago in United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 12:43 pm
Samsung, et al., the United States District Court for the Northern District of California reiterated the importance of preserving electronically stored information. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 10:11 am
Posted by Greg MersolAnother California case has compelled the arbitration of a wage and hour claim in the wake of the United States Supreme Court's decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 6:48 am
Pecover et al v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 2:58 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in Byrnie v Town of Cromwell Board of Education, 243 F3d 93 [2001], explained that spoliation sanctions serve three purposes: (1) deterring parties from destroying evidence; (2) placing the risk of an erroneous evaluation of the content of the destroyed evidence on the party responsible for its destruction; and (3) restoring the party harmed by the loss of evidence helpful to its case to where the party would have… [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 6:21 pm
The Court is the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 6:21 pm
The Court is the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 2:28 pm
One of the plaintiffs is Darth Vader, and the defendant is none other than the most powerful entity in this solar system, the United States of America…! [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 9:43 am
(See, Harold Griffith v. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 12:21 pm
As the United States Supreme Court observed in Harris v. [read post]
4 Aug 2012, 2:54 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 8:08 pm
No. 10-2734 JCH, United States District Court, D. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 12:31 pm
United States, 517 U.S. 806, 813 (1996); United States v. [read post]
