Search for: "United States v. May"
Results 8901 - 8920
of 47,752
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2012, 2:50 am
" Without further comment, here is Breytman v Schechter ; 2011 NY Slip Op 51375(U) ; Supreme Court, Kings County Schack, J. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 6:15 pm
Section 505 of the Copyright Act provides:In any civil action under this title, the court in its discretion may allow the recovery of full costs by or against any party other than the United States or an officer thereof. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 6:15 pm
Section 505 of the Copyright Act provides:In any civil action under this title, the court in its discretion may allow the recovery of full costs by or against any party other than the United States or an officer thereof. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 2:13 pm
Nonetheless, a partyseeking judicial review of a Commission determinationmust establish that it presents a case or controversy forwhich the federal courts have jurisdiction under Article IIIof the United States Constitution. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 9:29 am
Before the United States Supreme Court handed down its recent 8-to-1 decision in Glacier Northwest v. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 10:36 am
See United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 11:23 am
Supreme Court made its decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 2:44 am
If the United States does intervene, it may settle or dismiss the action notwithstanding the relator’s objection, see § 3730(c)(2). [read post]
18 Jun 2008, 5:48 pm
As an agent points out in United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 11:44 am
United States, 977 F. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 11:27 am
By Gregg Fisch and Jonathan Sokolowski Earlier this week, the United States Supreme Court narrowed the definition of “supervisor” for purposes of employment-related claims. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 1:26 pm
And it may be a boon to the local economy, with New York same-sex couples no longer having weddings -- and receptions -- in the neighboring states of Connecticut, Massachusetts, and Vermont. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 5:04 pm
In Colony Insurance Co. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 8:16 am
She noted that this is a “common fact pattern” and is consistent with the facts underlying the court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2018, 9:54 am
At first sight, that may call into question the merits of Samsung's antisuit injunction. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 1:00 am
In March 2005 a State requested that the appellant’s name be added to the Consolidated List. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 5:12 am
Such a statute could read: No state or locality may rely upon the new constitutional standard for substantial nexus articulated by the United States Supreme Court in South Dakota v. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 8:08 am
Bartlett v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 7:55 am
United States. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 12:06 pm
” United States v. [read post]
