Search for: "Does, A-H" Results 8921 - 8940 of 16,596
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2013, 2:59 pm by Matthew David Brozik
”  The survey asked, “What is the first thing that comes to your mind when you hear the name ‘Charbucks,’ spelled C-H-A-R-B-U-C-K-S? [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 5:00 am
We will answer those questions and provide the Q&A on our H-1B Visa Lawyer Blog. [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 9:06 am by Stephen Bilkis
A New York Custody Lawyer said the uncertified translation of the arbitration award indicates that paragraphs A through H inclusive relative to custody of, and visitation with, the children. [read post]
16 Nov 2013, 9:30 pm by Bill Marler
Amended “Packaged” in (1) to delete the term “securely” to avoid undue emphasis on nature of the package; Amended “Packaged” in (2) to remove the phrase “or other nondurable container” to clarify when foods packaged at retail need to be labeled so that it reads: “Packaged” does not include wrapped or placed in a carry-out container to protect the food during service or delivery to the consumer, by a food employee, upon consumer… [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
"What does it mean to lose your citizenship?" [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 2:21 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  So, unfamously, does defendant (doing business as Black Bear), and it called its dark roast blend “Charbucks Blend,” now “Mister Charbucks. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:04 pm by Roshonda Scipio
Administrative LawFederal administrative law / by Gary Lawson.Lawson, Gary, 1958-St. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 4:20 am by Steven Gursten
” October 8, 2013: “Medical care under Medicare will not protect injured senior drivers like Michigan No Fault insurance does” September 9, 2013: “Why proposed bill to exempt MI seniors from No Fault insurance is a terrible idea for elderly” For more facts, statistics and a thorough analysis of House Bill 4612, please check out Michigan Auto Law’s “The Auto Insurance Consumers’ Guide to No Fault Reform and House Bill 4612. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
H.19, as amended (the “Code”), dated May 18, 2009. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 4:30 am by Karen Tani
 This is not an attempt to ascertain some sort of original meaning of legislation or jurisprudence; nor does it simply mobilize historical “facts” in service of a contemporary interpretation or agenda. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:09 pm by Eugene Volokh
A religious exemption does not violate the Establishment Clause simply by exempting religious institutions but not secular institutions “A law is not unconstitutional simply because it allows churches to advance religion. [read post]