Search for: "In re: Justice v." Results 8921 - 8940 of 18,118
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2014, 1:14 pm by Eleonora Rosati
 From the audience, Mr Justice Richard Arnold asked whether US copyright reform is going to take into account criticisms of non-compliance with international instruments and lack of moral right protection. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 11:47 am by Anushka Limaye
Ingrid Wuerth argued that, in the upcoming Jam v. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  Over at Concurring Opinions, Tuan Samahon, Villanova Law, draws upon Judge Oliver Gasch’s in addressing the likelihood that then-Judge Scalia wrote the per curiam for a three-judge district court that Chief Justice Burger drew upon holding the Gramm-Rudman-Hollings Act unconstitutional in Bowsher v. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 5:31 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The federal courts have split on this issue, prompting the Supreme Court to hear the case.The case is Warger v. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 6:34 am
  Really, you're going to flip out over $250?!? [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 4:00 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Determining either number averageor weight average molecular weight, by contrast, re-quires additional calculations based on the underly-ing chromatographic data. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 4:37 am by Gritsforbreakfast
" I always get nervous when Texans start touting their methods as a "national model," as folks in San Antonio are wont to do about mental-health services in their justice system. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 9:45 am
It is a low cost IP court for England and Wales which enables access to justice for SMEs with IP disputes to resolve. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 6:58 am by Bexis
Bartlett – that is to say Mutual Pharmacy Co. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 11:42 am by Christine Corcos
Un mur de glace de plusieurs dizaines de mètres de haut constituet-il une frontière au sens juridique du terme ? [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 2:04 pm
”“The sentencing judge did not err in finding the sentence proportional to the gravity of the offence,” said the three-judge panel in its decision in R v. [read post]