Search for: "Marks v. State "
Results 8921 - 8940
of 21,697
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2014, 12:11 pm
Electronics v. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 12:51 am
Gillie and the prisoner exhaustion case Ross v. [read post]
13 May 2009, 8:17 am
The Utah Supreme Court has reminded the bar in McKelvey v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 9:47 am
Here is the abstract: After Washington v. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 2:16 am
However, used descriptively is ruled legal [Mind Candy Ltd v. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 12:26 pm
In State v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 11:11 am
In Martin et al. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 2:06 pm
Dale, Lawrence v. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 7:42 am
Case date: 17 March 2021 Case number: No. 19-2316 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
20 May 2021, 7:14 am
Writing separately, Circuit Judge Rawlinson said she would have affirmed the district court’s decision (OTR Wheel Engineering, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 1:34 am
Consequently, the appellate court remanded the case to the trial court to allow it to reconsider this award (4 Pillar Dynasty LLC v. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 7:45 am
Circuit handed down an important computer search case Friday, United States v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 3:22 am
. , Serial No. 77954696 [Section 2(a) refusal of SWISS+TECH for expandable and compact multi-function hand tools and electronic devices, on the ground of geographical deceptiveness].May 8, 2012 - 10 AM: United States Postal Service v. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 5:14 pm
[S]ee also Day Zimmermann, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 5:02 am
Puerto Rico Coffee Roasters LLC v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 8:05 am
1975 Duke L.J. 188.Cohen, Mark C., United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2020, 3:06 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 7:27 pm
Judge Fletcher explains why.United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 9:30 pm
His book, M’Culloch v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 4:00 am
Overtime paid to a police officer for “special-duty” for service performed for a private entity not included in determining the “final average salary” for retirement purposesTamucci v DiNapoli, 2015 NY Slip Op 08027, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentBetween 1989 and 2009, Town and Village of Harrison Police Department [HPD] police sergeant Mark Tamucci was a member of New York State Police and Fire Retirement System [PFRS]. [read post]
