Search for: "VI" Results 8921 - 8940 of 13,327
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2012, 3:45 am by Sylvain Métille
Comme de nombreuses informations liées à des personnes qui ne sont pas visées par l’enquête (donc non soupçonnées) peuvent être concernées, une sélection particulière devra être effectuée. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 9:01 pm by Steve Shiffrin
” In the same vein, Boston College theologian Richard Gaillardetz asked in a facebook comment the other day: "’What if’ Paul VI had adopted a more personalist approach to the issue of contraception, one that focused on the need for marital couples to be genuinely open... [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 8:48 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
We had written previously in this blog about the investment arbitration between White Industries (Australia) Ltd. against the Government of India. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 4:19 pm
The one decision discussing the Graves Amendment vis-a-vis free service loaners, Zisersky v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 9:18 am by James L. Higgins
Finally, Judge Robinson provided guidance on the parties’ use of the reexamination file wrapper at trial, and cautioned that “it has been the court’s observation that reexamination evidence is, at best, confusing vis-à-vis the complex invalidity standards the jury is asked to apply. . . . [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 5:02 am
Confira, abaixo, o resumo dos julgamentos previstos para a sessão plenária desta quinta-feira (16), no STF, a partir das 14h. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 3:14 am by Michael Perry
The bishops argued that this was a violation of conscience since birth control is contrary to teachings of the Catholic Church, as expressed in Pope Paul VI’s 1968 encyclical “Humanae Vitae. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 2:06 am by Adam Wagner
The Appellant argued that the BBC’s immunity under Part VI of Schedule I to FOIA was limited to information in category (4). [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 6:39 pm
In their simplest forms, discussions of “judicial independence” – which of course was the principle repeatedly invoked by the lawyers’ movement in 2007 – tend solely to consider the balance between the judiciary’s autonomy and accountability vis-à-vis the executive and legislature. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 3:02 pm
Para os advogados do condenado, a existência de um corréu que exercia, à época dos fatos, o cargo de secretário de Educação, ocasionava a aplicação do artigo 115, VI, da Constituição do Estado de Rondônia, que estabelece que “o Tribunal de Justiça é competente para julgar crimes comuns praticados pelos secretários de Estado”. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 9:39 am by admin
tid=pm_entertainment_pop “It’s bad enough that Catholics have to fight for their rights vis-à-vis a hostile administration in Washington without also having to fend off attacks in the entertainment industry. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 8:12 am by Alex Aldridge
Here are those tour rules… (i) Cheating is allowed; (ii) No anti-lad behavior allowed (i.e. calling girlfriends, being nice to random expats); (iii) Everyone has each others backs; (iv) No stealing ties or light bulbs; (v) Compulsory gunning of parents affairs; (vi) Mentioning parents salaries once a day; and (vii) Being good lads (i.e. getting a round in for England); (viii) Chants about your surrounding environment, being oily and how rich we are, are compulsory; (ix) Public… [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 6:41 am
Keep in mind that as the people of Iran battled in the streets, President Obama did nothing.As he is doing --or not doing-- today vis-a-vis Syria.. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 5:37 am by Tim Zinnecker
 Indeed, throughout history from the fateful kiss of betrayal by Judas in the Garden of Gethsemane leading to the most famous trial of human history, to 1019 when a kiss was required by law for the transfer of property, to the ban in 1439 by King Henry VI to avoid passing along the Black Death, to the 1500s when the “kiss of peace” was required for all peace agreements in Spain --- law has tried to harness this force of nature, through prohibiting the kiss or requiring one!… [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 4:49 am by Editor
Section 409A manages, all at once, to (i) fail to better neutralize the tax treatment of deferred compensation with that of current compensation, (ii) impose significant compliance costs on sophisticated taxpayers, and (iii) provide a dangerous trap for unsophisticated taxpayers.Ideally, Congress should repeal § 409A and replace it with a system that taxes deferred compensation more neutrally vis-a-vis current compensation. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 10:20 pm by SELENEDUK
yo por ejemplo tenía saldo a favor por descuentos indebidos del ISR cumpli con todos los requisitos y nunca vi ese dinero, esto más bien me suena a campaña ... [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 9:08 pm by Samir Chopra
., merely tweak them to accommodate artificial agents without changing their status vis-a-vis contracting) but run the risk of imposing implausible readings of contract theories in doing so. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
This rule was introduced to give the EPO the means to react appropriately when the applicant dropped existing claims and replaced them with originally non-unitary subject-matter extracted from the description (see the Notice published in OJ EPO 1995, 409, in particular pages 420 and 421, point 2; see also Guidelines for Examination, C-VI, 5.2(ii), in particular the second paragraph of this section). [read post]