Search for: "*u.s. v. Chang" Results 8941 - 8960 of 24,070
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2018, 6:39 am by Michael Risch
The first types of damages don't change after WesternGeco. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 4:46 pm
The editorial board said: Change may be coming, Jefferson said, because the U.S. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 5:00 am by Pranay Vaddi
Second, even if the modernized Backfire’s range capability is less than 8,000 kilometers but it is used to carry Kinzhal, U.S. policymakers may still have a good argument that the aircraft should be limited as a “new kind” of strategic offensive armament under Article V of the treaty. [read post]
17 May 2007, 9:09 am
Again, this is simply wrong since the deference cases - going back to Chevron itself, 467 U.S. at 863-64, state repeatedly that courts should respect changes in administrative position as long as they are explained.Another problem we have with Barnhill is that the case was decided on a motion to dismiss. [read post]