Search for: "STATE V. POWERS" Results 8941 - 8960 of 41,395
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2008, 2:30 pm
Supreme Court decision in the Connecticut case of Kelo v. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
Supreme Court for argument time to support a challenge to New York City gun restrictions,” New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 10:55 pm by Catriona Murdoch
As a check on these powers the report noted the body who received complaints about such surveillance, the Investigatory Powers Tribunal. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 9:06 am by Michael Dorf
 Absent the violation of some external norm, as in a case like United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 6:30 am by Kali Borkoski
Bill Olson – 1 Promoted Comment The United States government’s position in Arizona v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 3:20 am
"The Supreme Court ruled that the Order was a valid exercise of the County Executive's power, was not an illegal act, and did not violate the State Constitution or the Municipal Home Rule Law [Godfrey v Spano, 15 Misc.3d 809]. [read post]
28 Oct 2021, 8:13 am by John Coyle
It is, however, a concise description of the facts presented in Nawai Wardak Transportation Co. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 1:24 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
This jurisprudential approach was on display in Seila Law v. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 9:09 am by Cyberleagle
Domestically, Liberty has a pending judicial review of the IP Act bulk powers and data retention powers. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 1:31 pm by JB
It was also addressed by the doctrine of Swift v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 7:51 am by Venkat
(My gut feeling is that Congress and state legislatures should have the power to define when a plaintiff can sue; at least they do so routinely. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 9:30 pm by John D. Graham
For a powerful exposition of these defects, look no further than Jonathan S. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 1:36 pm by Conor McEvily
Today’s petition of the day is: Title: International Boundary Commission v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 1:30 pm by Karen Tani
These bounty orders remained in effect until at least 1868, when their constitutionality was finally questioned by the Minnesota Supreme Court in State v. [read post]