Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B." Results 8941 - 8960 of 15,310
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Sep 2013, 6:48 am by Schachtman
A or B or C ~A B or C ~BC The syllogism works as a valid form of argument if the premises are all true. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 7:44 pm by Mary Dwyer
The petitions of the day are: Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm by Mary Dwyer
§ 7410’s express limit on the EPA’s disapproval authority and decisions of other courts of appeals, the EPA may substitute its own policy preferences for a states about the appropriate means of controlling air pollution within that state, without identifying any applicable “requirement of th[e] [Clean Air Act]” with which the states chosen means would interfere; and (2) whether the panel… [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 11:56 pm
  In RPL Central Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Patents [2013] FCA 871, 30 August 2013, Middleton J confirmed that the question of patentability under Australian law is to be guided by the seminal and watershed decision of the Australian High Court in NRDC v Commissioner (1959) 102 CLR 252. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 2:00 am by koherston
[B]ecause the proof did not bear out Mother’s other stated purposes, it appears that the main purpose behind Mother’s proposed relocation is to reside with her new husband…. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 1:14 am by Afro Leo
Sections A, B, C and D of the commentary all help to provide further context and perspective.But he is critical. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 8:34 pm by Bill Marler
In a memo to FDA, the committee states: “the sixty-day aging process for hard cheese is questionable as an effective measure in support of the public’s health. [read post]