Search for: "DOE v. UNITED STATES"
Results 8961 - 8980
of 44,302
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2020, 9:01 pm
United States, Justice Elena Kagan hardly vindicated the erstwhile officials. [read post]
11 May 2020, 12:12 pm
The first of the two cases—40 Main Street Offices, LLC v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 11:34 am
Defendants filed a motion to dismiss, arguing, inter alia, that the California statute does not require that packaging be made in the United States. [read post]
11 May 2020, 11:03 am
(rescheduled before the November 1, 2019, and November 8, 2019, conferences; relisted after the November 15, 2019, November 22, 2019, December 6, 2019, December 13, 2019, January 10, January 17, January 24, February 21, February 28, March 6, March 20, March 27, April 3, April 17 and April 24 conferences) United States v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 10:09 am
" The question raised in United States v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 10:06 am
" United States v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 9:29 am
United States is a case about the classification of used clothing coming into the United States.The plaintiff imported bales of used clothing and classified the merchandise in HTSUS item 6309.00.00 as "worn clothing," which is a duty free. [read post]
11 May 2020, 8:54 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 8:07 am
First, Paradis does not note the massive changes to the convening authority’s posttrial review power now encoded in Article 60a of the UCMJ. [read post]
11 May 2020, 6:37 am
United States Soccer Federation, Inc. here. [read post]
11 May 2020, 1:09 am
Furthermore, Justice Blackmun’s observation about traditional means was looking back at an era when in most state and federal court, a person found to be minimally qualified, could pretty much say anything regardless of scientific validity. [read post]
10 May 2020, 9:01 pm
”The appeals court described the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
10 May 2020, 1:41 pm
United States, ––– U.S. [read post]
10 May 2020, 5:04 am
What does it say? [read post]
10 May 2020, 3:15 am
– Paul Bernal https://t.co/HP1FHubcLY 2020-05-09 Sign-in wrap agreement enforced in Babcock v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
8 May 2020, 3:21 pm
” United Mine Workers v. [read post]
8 May 2020, 1:05 pm
Ruling on a Rule 48(a) motion in 2019 in United States v. [read post]
8 May 2020, 11:19 am
The Clean Water Act defines “navigable waters” to be “waters of the United States,” a phrase which the Act does not define. [read post]
