Search for: "Petite v. United States"
Results 8961 - 8980
of 13,105
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2011, 8:20 am
At oral argument in the Texas state prisoner’s federal habeas case Gonzalez v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 6:50 am
The United States District Court and the United States Court of Appeals previously ruled in favor of the Federal Reserve and dismissed Mr. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 6:02 am
Image via WikipediaThe United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit yesterday upheld its 2008 ruling that the Federal Communications Commission acted "arbitrarily and capriciously" when it fined CBS Corp. $550,000 for airing the 2004 Super Bowl XXXVIII halftime wardrobe malfunction that caused Justin Timberlake to bare Janet Jackson's breast for an entire nine-sixteenths of a second (see "TUOL" post 9/17/09).As reported by the Associated Press, the… [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 5:27 pm
For example, a very recent United States Supreme Court Case dealt with the enforceability of an arbitration clause in a cellphone contract that disallowed class-action suits, AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 11:08 am
On Monday, October 31, 2011 (hello, Halloween), the United States Supreme Court issued the following Order: 10-1450 SONIC-CALABASAS A, INC. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 7:26 am
” Finally, Joan Biskupic of the USA Today previews next week’s argument in United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 6:42 am
Gameologist Group, LLC v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 8:48 am
United States, 10-7387. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 3:00 am
The case of the day is United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 9:20 am
Granville (2000) 530 U.S. 57, decided by the United States Supreme Court almost twelve years ago. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 9:20 am
Granville (2000) 530 U.S. 57, decided by the United States Supreme Court almost twelve years ago. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 9:20 am
Granville (2000) 530 U.S. 57, decided by the United States Supreme Court almost twelve years ago. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 7:00 am
United States, a case that presents questions about the relationship between religious speech and political speech for purposes of tax exemptions. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 5:40 am
A member of the panel then states that, in her opinion, a Bivens cause of action does not require congressional action, and that the government’s argument relies on United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:00 am
These and other questions are addressed in a recent decision of interest by the Brooklyn Surrogate's Court in Sealy v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:38 pm
Lyon Docket: 11-80 Issue: (1) Whether, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 19(b), courts may adjudicate and compromise legal rights in land to which the United States holds title without the United States’s participation in the litigation; and (2) whether, in light of this Court’s recent decision in United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 12:12 pm
Entry 141) regarding all claims of Plaintiffs arising from the United States Constitution. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 12:12 pm
Padilla was an al Queda solider who formerly fought against the United States and ordering the Secretary to take Mr. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 8:41 am
The states and United States argue that, so long as the defendant has not been deprived a fair and reliable trial, there is no prejudice under Strickland. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 6:54 am
At this blog and the Volokh Conspiracy, Professor Orin Kerr examines the second question presented in United States v. [read post]
