Search for: "AC v. State"
Results 881 - 900
of 1,882
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2014, 6:37 am
Burger King's insurer, ACE American Insurance Company, denied the claim. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 7:05 am
He distinguished the leading English case holding that an agreement to negotiate is not enforceable – Walford v Miles, [1992] 2 AC 128 – on the basis that in that case there was no existing contract with an obligation to negotiate in it. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 7:19 am
In R v Lord Chancellor Ex p Witham[1998] QB 575 he noted (at 581) that “in the unwritten legal order of the British state” it is “the common law [which] continues to accord a legislative supremacy to Parliament”. [read post]
20 Jul 2014, 12:28 pm
Williams v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
June. 13, 2013), holding essentially that, since those meanies on the United States Supreme Court aren’t letting plaintiffs sue generic manufacturers, we’ll change Alabama common law and let them sue someone else. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 10:58 am
DSI currently co-promotes Effient® products in the United States with Lilly. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 7:12 am
The style of the case is Why Nada Cruz, L.L.C. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 12:05 pm
Noel Canning and McCullen v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 10:28 am
Effient products were approved by the FDA for the reduction of thrombotic cardiovascular events in certain patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who are to be managed with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI, or angioplasty). [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 10:42 pm
The StreetView case — Google v. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 10:42 pm
The StreetView case — Google v. [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 5:25 pm
On 18 June 2014 the Supreme Court handed down judgment in R (T) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] UKSC 35. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 1:32 am
Background Last week the Supreme Court handed down judgment in R (T) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] UKSC 35. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 7:41 am
California and United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 1:26 am
In Din v Wandsworth LBC [1983] AC 657, the House of Lords had, by a majority, held that the correct date for determining intentionality was the date when the household left their accommodation. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 10:00 pm
On June 13, 2014, the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals issued its opinion in Alabama Forrest Products Industry Workmen’s Compensation Self Insurer’s Fund v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 1:52 pm
In Why Nada Cruz, LLC v. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 7:53 pm
If a drug company, in 1995, marketed antenatal corticosteroid (ACS) for the prevention of cerebral palsy (CP) in the United States, the government might well have prosecuted the company for misbranding. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 6:06 pm
Goodman v. [read post]
25 May 2014, 11:08 am
The defendant relies upon the case of State of Columbia v Heller. [read post]
