Search for: "Alabama v. Texas" Results 881 - 900 of 1,025
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Oct 2023, 8:27 am by Amy Howe
Marshall, a case that began as lawsuits brought by two Alabama women, Halima Culley and Lena Sutton. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
James Paul Grigson, Jr., of Texarkana, Texas, known to many as “Dr. [read post]
7 May 2012, 12:06 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Carpenter, Texas Wesleyan School of Law (United States) Christine Haight Farley, American University, Washington College of Law (United States) Are there any outer limits? [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 8:40 am
Coleman of Austin, Texas, that, when  the record actually assembled by Congress is examined, “I don’t understand how you can maintain that things have radically changed. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 12:33 pm by Kevin
Of course, everything’s bigger in Texas, and that includes the constitution at 86,936 words. [read post]
8 May 2025, 5:38 pm by Steven Calabresi
Then there was the extortionate threat that the Biden-Harris Administration made in Murthy v. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 8:11 am
Price, No. 07-40040 A sentence for being a felon in possession of a firearm is vacated and remanded where the district court plainly erred in assigning a base offense level of 24 under U.S.S.G. 2K2.1(a)(2) because one of defendant's prior drug convictions could have been merely for an offer to sell under section 481.112 of the Texas Health and Safety Code. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 12:54 pm by Bexis
Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Alabama, 42 So.3d 1216 (Ala. 2010). [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
” I have no particular brief for high Federalists from New England, but I do wonder what we might think had Garrison actually been influential and several New England states accepted his view and tried to secede, say, after the Supreme Court’s decision in Prigg v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 1:02 pm by Erin F. Fonté and Ferdose al-Taie
By contrast, the Texas Department of Banking issued a supervisory memo on April 03, 2014, establishing that “because cryptocurrency is not money under the Money Services Act, receiving it in exchange for a promise to make it available at a later time or different location is not money transmission. [read post]