Search for: "Anthony v. Anthony" Results 881 - 900 of 6,431
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2021, 3:47 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The allegations of wrongdoing against Feder, RESF, Goldberg, and Herrick Feinstein are equally deficient inasmuch as they fail to allege specific facts from which it could be reasonably inferred that Feder, RESF, Goldberg, and Herrick Feinstein acted with the requisite degree of scienter (see Sammy v Haupel, 170 AD3d 1224, 1225), and/or otherwise fail to allege specific facts from which it could be inferred that the alleged deceit was the proximate cause of any injury to Edward or… [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 8:16 am by WSLL
Affirmed.Case Name: ROBERT STEVEN HANKINS v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 3:30 am
Statute of limitations no bar to bring disciplinary charges when the allegations claim “continuous incompetency” Canna v Town of Amherst, 55 AD3d 1269 Town of Amherst Superintendent of the Wastewater Treatment Facility Anthony R. was terminated from his employment following a hearing conducted pursuant to Civil Service Law §75 (1) based on charges alleging incompetence in the supervision of the operation of the facility. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 11:21 am
Statute of limitations no bar to bring disciplinary charges when the allegations claim "continuous incompetency"Matter of Canna v Town of Amherst, 2008 NY Slip Op 07300, Decided on October 3, 2008, Appellate Division, Fourth DepartmentTown of Amherst Superintendent of the Wastewater Treatment Facility Anthony R. was terminated from his employment following a hearing conducted pursuant to Civil Service Law §75 (1) based on charges of incompetent supervision of… [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 4:09 pm by Anthony Colangelo
He is the coauthor with Anthony D’Amato of the Law of Nations Scholars amicus brief submitted in support of neither party in Kiobel v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 9:15 am
  LINKJust who was Justice Anthony Kennedy calling out when he fired back at critics of the Supreme Court's use of international law in its opinions? [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
  Here is the abstract: This article examines the negative effect fallacy, a flawed statistical argument first utilized by the Warren Court in Elkins v. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 1:58 pm
”   He discusses yesterday’s decision in Estrada v. [read post]