Search for: "Basis International Ltd." Results 881 - 900 of 1,808
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jul 2015, 3:10 am by Charlotte Bamford, Olswang LLP
In making this assertion, they relied on the Provision of Services Regulations 2009 (SI 2009/2999) which implements the Services Directive (Directive 2006/123/EC on Services in the Internal Market). [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 2:43 am
The trouble with TK is that there is a very unbalanced dialogue between the parties involved in the debate moving towards a proper international TK system, writes Darren. [read post]
19 Jul 2015, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
Rahman v ARY Network Ltd, heard 1, 2 and 6 July 2015 (Haddon-Cave J). [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
Visa Travel International Ltd. (1983), 74 C.P.R. (2d) 243 (FCTD). [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
  The basis of Mr Stenson’s plea was that his co-conspirators were Andy Coulson and Dan Evans. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 3:27 am by Ryan Dolby-Stevens, Olswang LLP
Mr Alan Carré worked for Guernsey Gas Light Co Ltd (whose successor in title was International Energy Group Ltd) in Guernsey for 27 years, from 1961 to 1988, after which he worked for another employer until his retirement in April 2008. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 7:34 am by Schachtman
  In particular, the requirements of the Rule 26(a) report do not create a limitation on Rule 26(b) discovery: “As a basis for withholding the above information, Ladd argues that Ernst & Young is not entitled to discover any expert witness information which is not specifically mentioned in Rule 26(a)(2)(B). [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 6:52 am by Schachtman
”[2] Despite the trial court’s failure to articulate any legally recognized basis for permitting the expert witness to stonewall in this fashion, a panel of the Circuit, in an opinion by superannuated Justice Tom Clark, affirmed, on an argument that the defendant “had not shown that it did not have an adequate basis on which to cross-examine plaintiff’s experts. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm by MOTP
It would seem that the dominant jurisdiction doctrine cannot furnish an answer - and would not provide a basis for abatement - because the two fora do not have co-extensive authority under an arbitration agreement that makes some claims arbitrable but not others, - at least not in a scenario where both types of claims are present in the same dispute and are contemporaneously pursued, in the respective fora, but involve a common core of case-determinative facts. [read post]
20 Jun 2015, 5:24 pm
” This includes all the correspondence, internal notes and memos, medical records, reports by outside vendors (surveillance reports and videos, reports from doctors they had you see or sent your records to for a peer review, vocational reviewers, etc.), and copies of your Plan and/or Policy. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
Reference was made to a number of cases, in particular, Global Torch Ltd v Apex Global Management Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 819. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 5:45 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The complaint, a copy of which can be found here, alleges that the defendants “made allegedly false and/or misleading statements and/or allegedly failed to disclose that Vipshop Holdings Ltd manipulated and overstated sales, receivables, profit, cash flows, and asset accounts including inventory and investments, that Vipshop Holdings Ltd’s financial statements contain GAAP violations by reporting revenue on a ‘gross’ basis, despite the fact that the… [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 4:13 am by Kevin Ha
  The Wisconsin Supreme Court finally addressed this issue recently in Runzheimer International, Ltd. v. [read post]
31 May 2015, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
Big Data: Big Challenges to Privacy and Data Protection, International Scholarly and Scientific Research & Innovation 9(1) 2015, Abu Baka [read post]
17 May 2015, 2:57 am by Matthias Weller
Jean-Sylvestre Bergé, Université Jean Moulin (Lyon 3) reflected on the dynamics of sources in international law on the basis of the Treaties mentioned above. [read post]
17 May 2015, 1:08 am
However, in practice this type of protection is typically afforded to international corporations with international reputations: PCCM had only a ‘modest’ reputation. [read post]