Search for: "Belt v. State" Results 881 - 900 of 1,051
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2012, 1:51 pm
In addition, although he was wearing the safety belt provided to him by his employer, plaintiff had not properly tethered to the order selector, despite having been directed to do so less than one hour before his accident. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 10:49 am
  Joint Statement of the Russian Federation and the People’s Republic of China on the International Relations Entering a New Era and the Global Sustainable Development February 4, 2022 At the invitation of President of the People’s Republic of China Xi Jinping, President of the Russian Federation Vladimir V. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
Citizens, 1919-1924Conveners: Kenneth Mack, Harvard Law School (kmack@law.harvard.edu), Laurie Wood, Florida State University (lmwood@fsu.edu), Jacqueline Briggs, University of Toronto - Centre for Criminology and Sociolegal Studies (jacq.briggs@mail.utoronto.ca), and John Wertheimer, Davidson College (jow [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 5:11 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Schaefer v Sioux Spine & Sport In Schaefer v Sioux Spine & Sport, plaintiff was seriously injured in a car accident. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 8:14 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
CCPIT is the agency most famously responsible for developing the Belt and Road Initiative, involving 126 countries and 29 international organizations. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 10:08 am by azatty
Are they visionary, or belt-and-suspenders types? [read post]
16 May 2022, 7:57 am by Sophia Tang
Since the UK not a Belt and Road Initiative (“BRI”) country, this case shows China adopts a liberal and flexible approach to enforce foreign judgments as a general policy. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 9:37 am
Expert Testimony 12 O.S. 2702, 2703 The legislation essentially incorporates Federal Rule 702 and 703 which adds language from Daubert v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
The Inter-American Court of Human RightsIndigenous People Maya Kaqchikel from Sumpango v. [read post]
3 May 2014, 8:56 am by Schachtman
Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Co., 461 F.3d 844 (7th Cir. 2006) (affirming summary judgment in disparate treatment discharge case, and noting judicial tendency to require “comparability” between plaintiffs and comparison group as a “natural response to cherry-picking by plaintiffs”); Miller v. [read post]