Search for: "Close v. U. S"
Results 881 - 900
of 1,729
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2017, 3:22 am
Dufficy in Shih v Kim, 2017 NY Slip Op 50281(U) [Sup Ct Queens County Mar. 2, 2017]. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 12:57 pm
Today, the Texas Supreme Court issued opinions in Severance v. [read post]
21 Jun 2015, 7:37 pm
[iv] Nichols v. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 4:18 am
She closed the laptop and called the Cridersville Police Department.Officer Huston returned to the residence. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 3:00 am
Ehlinger v. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 11:07 am
I-2 U 31/16). [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 7:14 am
’s office. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 4:00 am
The other ground mentioned by Justice Adams is the Dead-Man’s Statute (CPLR 4519), which makes testimony by an interested witness “concerning a personal transaction or communication between the witness and [a] deceased person or mentally ill person” excludable “[u]pon the trial of an action or the hearing upon the merits of a special proceeding. [read post]
11 Mar 2018, 12:06 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 6:47 am
U. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 7:19 am
” In the New York Times, Steven Greenhouse reports that labor unions have reacted to the Court’s ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 4:20 am
Prouse, 440 U. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 3:22 pm
NLRB, 467 U. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 12:15 pm
Abel v. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 6:29 pm
Fox v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 3:26 pm
’ Later that night, defendant purposefully bumped into Blake.As Edwards and Blake were in the lobby trying to leave the party, defendant quickly approached Blake with her closed fist in the air. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 4:50 pm
Though Life Technologies v. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 4:40 am
” Third, the Court held: [T]he court cannot determine as a matter of law that it was improper for Kessler to counterclaim against Pascal individually, particularly because JJS is a closely held corporation and its interests are tied closely with Pascal’s own interests (see Conant v Schnall, 33 AD2d 326, 328 [3d Dept 1970] [citing general rule that a ‘shareholder bringing a derivative action is not subject to counterclaims against him… [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 4:32 am
In Zelouf v Zelouf, 2013 NY Slip Op 32073(U) [Sup Ct, NY County Aug. 30, 2013], Justice Kornreich declined to invalidate the freeze-out merger of a corporation cashing out a minority shareholder’s interest in the business on the eve of a jury trial, rendering the member’s exclusive remedy an appraisal proceeding under Section 623 of the Business Corporation Law. [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 8:01 pm
“The Court may consider the company’s past performance as well as future events that are ‘known or susceptible of proof’ as of the valuation date” (Ferolito v AriZona Beverages USA LLC, 2014 NY Slip Op 32830(U) [Sup Ct, Nassau County Oct. 14, 2014]). [read post]
