Search for: "D, Otherwise C. v. C" Results 881 - 900 of 4,548
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2021, 6:16 am by Russell Knight
So, they’d better figure out how to make some money before the maintenance expires. [read post]
26 May 2021, 8:40 pm by Adeline Chong
Singapore law (The Royal Bank of Scotland NV v TT International Ltd [2015] 5 SLR 1104) has instead a narrow exception based on the satisfaction following cumulative requirements: (a) the decision said to give rise to issue estoppel must directly affect the future determination of the rights of the litigants; (b) the decision must be shown to be clearly wrong; (c) the error in the decision must be shown to have stemmed from the fact that some point of fact or law relevant to the… [read post]
25 May 2021, 2:55 am by Colby Pastre
Table of Contents Key Findings Introduction A Brief Overview of GILTI Calculating GILTI Tax Liability State Taxation of GILTI Is Complex and Uncompetitive State Taxation of GILTI Raises Constitutional Issues Current Status of States’ Taxation of GILTI The Impact on States of the Biden Administration’s Proposed Federal Changes to GILTI A Brief Overview of FDII Current State Treatment of the FDII Deduction and the Impact of the Biden Administration’s Proposed Changes Recent… [read post]
23 May 2021, 4:01 am by Administrator
(W.)D.; Similar Fact EvidenceR. v. [read post]
22 May 2021, 2:46 pm
  However, that does not entail preservation of all the elements of which the system consists: cf Secretary for Justice v Lau Kwok Fai & Anor[39]; applied in Catholic Diocese of Hong Kong v Secretary for Justice[40] ; (b) there is no challenge to the constitutionality of NSL 46(1); and (c) in view of: (i) the special status of the NSL as a national law enacted with a specific purpose of safeguarding national security; and (ii) the… [read post]
19 May 2021, 8:47 am by Jonathan Shaub
Over two years ago, the release of Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report on Russian interference in the 2016 election focused the spotlight on President Trump’s longtime White House counsel, Don McGahn, whose testimony to the special counsel’s office featured prominently in the report’s discussion of potential obstruction of justice by Trump. [read post]