Search for: "Doe 35" Results 881 - 900 of 17,228
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2011, 7:49 am by Mark Terry
" This decision teaches us that a proper 35 U.S.C. 103 obviousness rejection need not disclose the exact or identical claim limitation at issue. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 8:31 am by Justin A. Coquat, J.D.
  The City of Selma is located 16 miles northeast of downtown San Antonio and straddles I-35 toward Austin. [read post]
22 Aug 2009, 4:00 am by Woodrow Pollack
Yesterday, the Court granted that request, and will decide the following 2 questions:Whether 35 U.S.C. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 10:07 am
While small in size, Bay Head does see its share of criminal offenses and motor vehicle violations activity due to its position along the Route 35 corridor. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 9:53 am by Antoinette Konski
In addition, the Federal Circuit explicitly stated that joint or divided infringement does not apply to direct infringement liability under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 11:16 am
"The president," he said, "has to be native-born and 35, but what about the vice-president? [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 10:35 pm
The plan does not include a sales tax increase that the governor had proposed, nor would it create the spending cap that Republicans sought. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 9:15 pm by Scott McKeown
Oren Technologies, which held issue joinder was embraced by 35 U.S.C. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 9:16 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
” Chakrabarty, 447 U.S. at 308.ANDMoreover, title 35 does not list a single ineligible category, suggesting that any new, non- obvious, and fully disclosed technical advance is eligible for protection, subject to the following limited judicially created exceptions.In line with the broadly permissive nature of § 101’s subject matter eligibility principles, judicial case law has created only three categories of subject matter outside the eligibility bounds of… [read post]
10 May 2017, 9:57 pm by Dennis Crouch
Does the invention need to be discoverable in some way? [read post]
Magenheimer that the Indiana Tort Claims Act (“ITCA”) does not govern a claim under Indiana Code chapter 35-47-11.1, which prohibits political subdivisions from regulating firearms (“Indiana Firearms Preemption Act” or “IFP Act”). [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 10:16 am by James Yang
These categories include a process, a machine, a manufacture or a composition of matter. (35 USC § 101). [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 6:07 am by Hull and Hull LLP
Barring congressional action, the lifetime exemption will drop from $5 million to $1 million and the top federal estate tax rate will jump from 35% to 55%. [read post]