Search for: "Does 1 - 33" Results 881 - 900 of 6,149
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2015, 5:00 am by Peter Berlin
“Jane Doe #1 allegedly woke up naked hours later with Sharper sexually assaulting her. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 9:21 am by Brittan J. Bush
Nonetheless, it does serve as a reminder that when a party recognizes an omission or mistake in an instrument affecting mineral rights, a party should not immediately opt for an easy fix via a notarial act of correction. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 9:21 am by Brittan J. Bush
Nonetheless, it does serve as a reminder that when a party recognizes an omission or mistake in an instrument affecting mineral rights, a party should not immediately opt for an easy fix via a notarial act of correction. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 9:21 am by Brittan J. Bush
Nonetheless, it does serve as a reminder that when a party recognizes an omission or mistake in an instrument affecting mineral rights, a party should not immediately opt for an easy fix via a notarial act of correction. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 10:31 am by Dennis Crouch
We conclude that the CFC erred in holding reissue claims 1–22 and 33–38 invalid for failure to meet the written description requirement of section 112. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 2:41 pm by Giles Peaker
Deregulation Act 2015 section 41(3) provides (in regard to sections 33-38 and 40) At the end of the period of three years beginning with the coming into force of a provision of sections 33 to 38 or section 40, that provision also applies to any assured shorthold tenancy of a dwelling-house in England— (a) which is in existence at that time, and (b) to which that provision does not otherwise apply by virtue of subsection (1) or (2). [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 3:50 am by Kevin Kaufman
Estonia does not levy any other type of property tax covered in the ITCI. [read post]
11 Jan 2015, 5:27 pm by Lanigan
 But I used to say my specialty was “entry law” and people would always look at me quizzically like what does that mean? [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 5:29 am
  The broadest rules change is a revision to Rule 26(b)(1), which re-defines the scope of discovery. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 2:01 am by Eleonora Rosati
Even if no sale or actual delivery of infringing goods actually occurred, the fact that the consumers were invited, by targeted advertising, to acquire ownership of the original or copy of the work in question, would suffice to trigger application of Article 4(1).What does this ruling mean? [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 7:10 am
" [Article 1(2)]The question that arises - and has actually arisen - is who is responsible for paying such royalty.The Resal Right Directive - in my view and contrary to the reasons for harmonization within Recital 9 - fails to provide a uniform response, in that Article 1(4) therein does not really mandate a harmonized approach at the level of individual Member States. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 8:07 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
"Design choice" arose:On appeal, Philips does not dispute the Board’s findingthat the invention in claim 1 of the ’988 patent isdisclosed by the combination of Hochstein and Hildebrand—i.e. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 5:57 am by John Hochfelder
She sued the doctor for medical malpractice and, after ruling in her favor on liability, the Queens County jury awarded pain and suffering damages in the sum of $2,500,000 ($1,500,000 past – 2 3/4 years, $1,000,000 future – 33 1/2 years). [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 1:38 am by Roel van Woudenberg
The Board carefully assessed the applicability of Art. 84 EPC as well as of Rule 42(1)(c) and Rule 48(1)(c) EPC as possible legal basis requiring adaptation of the description, and concluded that such basis does not exist (except possible in the case of non-unity). [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 6:00 am by Beth Bernstein
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. [read post]