Search for: "Does 1 - 41"
Results 881 - 900
of 4,705
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2015, 10:54 am
The parties may instead file a joint stipulation of dismissal under Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 1:05 pm
Rule 41 does not discuss the potential content of a reply brief other than to note that the reply brief “shall not include any new or non-admitted amendment, or any new or non-admitted affidavit or other evidence. 37 C.F.R. [read post]
24 Dec 2019, 4:37 am
” In a 2-1 decision, the Second Circuit held that Cheeks does not extend to FRCP 68 offers of judgment, and that accepted OJs are an exception to the general rule requiring approval of private FLSA settlements. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 5:43 pm
Id. at 1334; Finisar, 523 F.3d at 1340-41. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 9:30 am
Does H.B. 2600 violate Article IV, Part 1, § 1(14) of the Constitution by superseding Proposition 115, which was defeated by a majority of the voters in 2012? [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 2:14 pm
Plaintiff does so, but then sues, asserting that as part of a collective, he should have been allowed to grow all 41. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 1:00 pm
§§ 41–9–1 to 41–9–7. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 1:00 pm
§§ 41–9–1 to 41–9–7. [read post]
29 Nov 2006, 1:05 pm
However, with the December 1 effective date for the new rules looming, the Applied Discovery survey found that many corporations face uncertainty and exposure. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 5:16 am
The game offered by the defendant does not require a stake and there is no payout. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 3:29 am
Here are the survey results from our recent poll about whistleblower policies & procedures: 1. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 11:27 am
The legislation does not specify what the technology will be. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 9:56 am
” For additional commentary in the field see: 1. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 2:02 pm
The researchers found that back surgeries result in a 41% increase in the use of painkillers, specifically opiates. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 6:31 am
City of New York, 95 N.Y.2d 1, 4B5 [2000]). [read post]
4 Jul 2019, 8:22 pm
54(4)(a) does not apply.[26] The exception in s. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 9:01 pm
In his statement dissenting from the Proposed Rule, Vice Chairman Travis Hill summarized the likely practical procedural effect of these changes: “Given (1) the number of deposit arrangements that may be newly scoped in by the rule, (2) the more subjective standard by which the FDIC will judge applications, and (3) the lack of grandfathering of existing arrangements, I suspect an enormous avalanche of applications may hit the FDIC on day 1, which the agency is completely… [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 12:04 am
Pitt has a weak offense, so this does not bide well for Panthers. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 11:36 am
Does 1-21, Atlantic v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 9:29 pm
1. [read post]
