Search for: "Does 1-29"
Results 881 - 900
of 12,945
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2013, 4:47 am
The opinion says that James Tagney Morgan and Van Asa Preston were married on March 29, 2008. . . . [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 8:32 am
§ 1295(a)(1). [read post]
3 May 2024, 6:30 am
Verret (George Mason University), and Greg Lawrence (Lawrence Law), on Monday, April 29, 2024 Tags: Insider trading, Punawat, SEC, SEC v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 6:30 am
Verret (George Mason University), and Greg Lawrence (Lawrence Law), on Monday, April 29, 2024 Tags: Insider trading, Punawat, SEC, SEC v. [read post]
28 Nov 2020, 3:46 am
This reports reflects the potential for an increased surge of workers’ compensation claims attributed to exposure to coronavirus in the workplace.The study published in The Lancet indicates:In patients with no previous psychiatric history, a diagnosis of COVID-19 was associated with increased incidence of a first psychiatric diagnosis in the following 14 to 90 days compared with six other health events, hazard ratios [HR] (HR 2⋅1, 95% CI 1⋅8–2⋅5 vs… [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 6:19 am
Niki Kelly of the Fort Wayne Journal Gazette's story includes these quotes:Wednesday's 3 1/2 -hour hearing focused almost solely on the intended and unintended consequences of the second section - 29 crucial words. [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 2:13 am
The wording of independent claim 1 of the main request is as follows:"1. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 4:25 pm
Two questions that have divided courts are: (1) does the “filing” requirement preclude oral complaints from protection, and (2) does an internal complaint qualify as “fil[ing] any complaint? [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 8:18 pm
" 29 C.F.R. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 4:30 am
-does not require recalculation. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 3:41 am
The bill also provides that no supplemental benefits will be paid in any case in which they are calculated to be less than $5 per week.Essential Workers Under the bill, "essential employee" is defined as an employee in the public or private sector who, during a state of emergency: (1) is a public safety worker or first responder, including any fire, police or other emergency responders; … [read post]
23 Jun 2019, 12:20 pm
Defendant does not dispute that his shotgun met § 921(a)(3)’s definition of a firearm. [read post]
9 May 2016, 5:53 am
App. 36 (2016) (holding that § 29-38c does not violate the second amendment). [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 7:00 am
For details on other Stoel Rives seminars and breakfast briefings, click here.)Situation No. 1. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 9:22 am
(See D.I. 223-1 Ex. 1iii! [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 1:16 pm
It does not. [read post]
31 May 2007, 5:15 am
"And so the Board affirmed the refusal to register pursuant to Sections 1, 2, 3, and 45 of the Lanham Act.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 8:03 am
That does sound intentional. [read post]
26 Sep 2018, 6:55 am
Source: Tax Foundation Alabama 39 20 30 48 15 12 Alaska 2 25 1 5 23 35 Arizona 27 17 19 47 5 13 Arkansas 46 40 40 44 26 34 California 49 31 49 43 14 17 Colorado 18 16 14 38 12 40 Connecticut 47 29 43 30 50 23 Delaware 11 50 41 2 9 3 Florida 4 6 1 22 11 2 Georgia 33 8 38 29 24 38 Hawaii 38 14 47 24 16 26 Idaho 21 26 23 26 4 48 Illinois 36 39 13 36 45 42 Indiana 10 18 15 12 2 11 Iowa 45 48 42 19 39 33 Kansas 28 34 21 31 20 15 Kentucky 23 27 17 14 35 47 Louisiana 44… [read post]
18 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm
Otherwise, the solution remains non-technical and does not enter into the examination for an inventive step. [10.2] To the Board’s knowledge, the other BoAs also apply A 56 EPC 1973 in the light of A 52(1)(2)(3), i.e. the Comvik approach is shared by all Boards. [read post]
