Search for: "Does 1-35" Results 881 - 900 of 9,563
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2011, 2:45 pm by Clare Freeman, RWS, WD Mich
§ 3742(a)(1).Issue:* Whether district courts may consider factors beyond substantial assistance in ruling on a Rule 35(b) motion to reduce sentence, and if such factors may be considered, how do they impact the extent of any reduction.Analysis:* Text of rule does not tell whether it authorizes district courts to look to § 3553(a) factors in deciding the extent of a reduction. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 8:02 am by Marx Sterbcow
A credit may be given from the seller to the borrower on page 1 of the HUD-1 to offset the charge. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 8:02 am
A credit may be given from the seller to the borrower on page 1 of the HUD-1 to offset the charge. [read post]
23 Oct 2016, 12:29 am
In particular, three main questions come to my mind once again.1) A deprivation of rights? [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 4:40 am by Beatrice Yahia
Here’s today’s news ISRAEL-HAMAS WAR War has resumed in Gaza as 35 people were killed and dozens wounded by Israeli airstrikes just two hours after the fighting pause agreement ended, according to the Hamas-run health ministry. [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 2:32 pm
§38-38-103(1)(c) will read:If a recorded instrument does not specify the address of the party purporting to have an interest in the property under such recorded instrument, the party shall not be entitled to notice and any interest in the property under such instrument shall be extinguished upon the execution and delivery of a deed pursuant to section 38-38-501. [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 2:32 pm
§38-38-103(1)(c) will read:If a recorded instrument does not specify the address of the party purporting to have an interest in the property under such recorded instrument, the party shall not be entitled to notice and any interest in the property under such instrument shall be extinguished upon the execution and delivery of a deed pursuant to section 38-38-501. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 11:00 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
Starting this year - indeed starting retroactively to January 1, 2010 - a new small business health care tax credit will be in effect that will provide a 35% tax credit on health premiums, with the credit increasing to 50% in 2014. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 9:37 am
Plaintiff now seeks a remand on the ground that this removal basis does not apply in this case.Because the issues raised have been fully briefed, the matter is now ripe for disposition. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 9:08 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
See Appellants’ Br. 6n.1 (stating that the appealed decisions “are substantivelynearly the same” and that it will refer only to Noven IIthroughout its brief), 35–65 (presenting arguments); seealso Appellee’s Br. 1 n.1 (agreeing to follow Novartis’sconvention and cite only to Noven II). [read post]