Search for: "Equality California "
Results 881 - 900
of 13,192
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2017, 6:24 pm
Most California consumer law attorneys offer free initial consultations to determine how to proceed with your ECOA case. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 5:03 am
In a lawsuit recently filed by the IRS, the Internal Revenue Service wants to order California’s Board of Equalization (a state tax agency) to provide its computer database of everyone who transferred real estate to relatives for little or no consideration from 2005 to 2010. [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 2:26 pm
Brown said in a statement, the law ensures that rich and poor people alike are treated equally. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 5:00 am
What Happens on a Third DUI in California? [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:37 pm
By not permitting corporations to avoid class actions through substitution of an arbitral forum, California Courts, applying the unconscionability doctrine, had somewhat safeguarded this procedural equalizer. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 8:16 am
"Prop 8 challengers will try to distinguish this initiative from others, that equality is somehow more important than other basic rights. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 2:50 pm
Finally, the court held that the California Probate Code does not provide a method of intestate succession for children conceived and born posthumously without the deceased biological parent's consent, and therefore, the child could not prove dependency under the laws of intestate succession.The court also held that it's holding did not present an equal protection violation because it did not exclude all posthumous children from eligibility for benefits, only those who do… [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 2:15 pm
Supreme Court on the issue of marriage equality. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:03 am
A plain reading of our Constitution’s text and history not only answers Justice Scalia’s cramped reading of the Equal Protection Clause, it is also central to the constitutional arguments for marriage equality made, for example, by Ted Olson and David Boies in the Perry litigation, which is currently awaiting a ruling by the California Supreme Court on the standing of the only remaining defendants, the Proposition 8 ballot proponents. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 1:08 pm
By finding Proposition 8 to violate the Equal Protection Clause solely on the ground that it withdrew the right of marriage that gays and lesbians previously possessed in California (as a result the earlier state supreme court's decision), Perry v. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 3:14 pm
After its review of DOMA, the Central District court concludes that it violates the equal protection rights of petitioners under the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 6:54 pm
John and Jane are a married couple who live together in a home in California. [read post]
13 Sep 2009, 9:09 pm
If you're a business in California that doesn't maintain inventory or sell products—that is, you're a service business—you haven't had to register with the Board of Equalization. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 12:49 pm
An equally divided Supreme Court affirmed the... [read post]
10 Dec 2016, 9:22 am
The state’s Board of Equalization has disagreed with this. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 5:50 am
Who Needs a Prenup in California? [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 6:23 am
For example, California’s equal pay law, which has been amended several times in the past five years, and bans compensation discrimination based on race or ethnicity, as well as sex, contains the catchall exception (i.e., any factor other than sex, race, or ethnicity), but requires that the factor or factors relied on to justify the wage disparity be job-related. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 11:06 am
Workers paid less than minimum wage are entitled to liquidated damages that equal the amount of underpaid wages plus interest. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 3:30 am
And, right now, the EEOC appears to be exploring those limits with a California company that owns a few eateries. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 3:33 pm
Still, legal experts said the ruling is important, in part because it reaffirms the right of state lawmakers to regulate large industries and corporations without running afoul of the “equal protection” rights of such companies under the U.S. [read post]
