Search for: "Good v. State of California" Results 881 - 900 of 7,481
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm by Stephen Lee
Citing the 1971 decision in Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 9:06 am by The Public Employment Law Press
” USC notes that one of the earliest recorded white collar crimes concerned an importer who, after taking out a loan to acquire goods for sale, planned to fake a shipwreck and make off with the goods and money.Another such scheme was the genesis of the ruling of the Lord Chief Justice, the 1st Earl of Mansfield [William Murray], in the Zone case [Gregson v Gilbert (1783) 3 Doug. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 9:14 am by Bill Stalter
As acknowledged by an opinion issued by the California Attorney General’s office, the Supreme Court’s decision in North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 9:28 am by Gary A. Watt
California’s economic downturn means that public works projects are fewer in number and smaller in scale as local and state agencies grapple with reduced funding. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 11:09 am by Eric Goldman
State Constitution Protection for Free Speech Censorship enthusiasts love citing the California Supreme Court Pruneyard v. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 5:05 pm by Randazza
This is good shit for anyone who finds that a censorious asshat from a state with a good Anti-SLAPP statute decides to file in an alternate forum, presumably to avoid the Anti-SLAPP consequences. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 10:02 am
An article in Friday's Recorder, "Heller Lawyer Named GC at California Department of Insurance" (subscription), had some interesting commentary by Lisa Perrochet on the Fairbanks case and the CLRA: In another development Wednesday affecting the insurance industry, the state Supreme Court agreed to hear Fairbanks v. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 1:49 pm
We cannot prevent other states from reporting their DUI convictions to California, which automatically update the DMV database and triggers the mandatory actions. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 8:02 am by Dave Maass
If that’s CDCR’s argument, it’s plainly wrong: in United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 12:24 pm by Paul Singer and Beth Chun
AGs Focus on AI: State Attorneys General have made clear they intend to use their consumer protection authority to examine businesses’ use of automated decision making technology in delivering consumers goods and services. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 10:06 am by Bruce Nye
Companies who find themselves on the right side of the "v" in California product liability litigation like federal court. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 1:59 pm by Gina Reif Ilardi and Molly Masenga
Discussing this standard, the California Supreme Court, in Kwikset Corp. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 10:12 pm
California and applied to car stops by New York v. [read post]