Search for: "Grant v. Sullivan" Results 881 - 900 of 1,021
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2020, 9:33 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
If the worker moved to one of the California municipalities with a higher rate, like Los Angeles County ($15 per hour), it is possible that amount would be due under the California Supreme Court’s Sullivan v. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Over at The Wall Street Journal, IJ Senior Attorney Michael Bindas explains why SCOTUS should grant cert in Carson v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 8:03 am by stevemehta
DENYING THE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; GRANTING THE DEFENDANT’S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT I. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 8:51 am by Arnold Wadsworth Coggins
A Probate and Family Court judge ordered the father to vacate the marital home and issued temporary orders granting the mother sole custody of the child, and a date for a hearing was set. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 9:30 am by Devlin Hartline
The immunities granted to us by the First Amendment have significant repercussions when it comes to the privileges we have, such as fair use, vis-à-vis the rights granted to copyright owners. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 4:40 am by Ben
Sullivan for the law of defamation. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 10:24 am by Cynthia L. Hackerott
The court declined, however, to adopt the magistrate’s determination to the extent that she found that a desk audit was equivalent to an administrative subpoena for the purposes of Fourth Amendment analysis and that the OFCCP did not apply neutral administrative criteria for selecting a certain BOA branch location for a compliance review (Bank of Am v Solis, July 2, 2014, Sullivan, E). [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 10:24 am by Cynthia L. Hackerott
The court declined, however, to adopt the magistrate’s determination to the extent that she found that a desk audit was equivalent to an administrative subpoena for the purposes of Fourth Amendment analysis and that the OFCCP did not apply neutral administrative criteria for selecting a certain BOA branch location for a compliance review (Bank of Am v Solis, July 2, 2014, Sullivan, E). [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 5:54 am by Jed Handelsman Shugerman
The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in Seila Law v. [read post]
1 May 2021, 5:16 pm by David Kopel
Supreme Court has granted certiorari to hear a major case on the right to bear arms, New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 5:25 am
to grant the right to protect TMs. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 5:05 am by Stephanie R. Thomas, Ph.D.
John Fullerton III posted “New York’s At-Will Employment Rule Applies to Compliance Officer Allegedly Fired for Objecting to Misconduct”, a piece written by William Milani and Anna Kolontyrsky about Sullivan v. [read post]