Search for: "Graves v. United States" Results 881 - 900 of 1,360
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The company has issued a recall on Rock ‘N Play infant Sleepers, which are manufactured in China and imported into the United States by Fisher-Price. [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
United States, a unanimous Supreme Court declared federal bench trials constitutionally permissible. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 5:59 am by @travelblawg
MacLean landed a victory for himself and the public when the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) ruled yesterday that he should have been protected under federal law and not fired for leaking information about Transportation Security Agency (TSA) plans to reduce Federal Air Marshal (FAM) covered flights, a move he believed would endanger the public in a time of higher terror threats (Summer 2003). [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 10:03 am by Amy Howe
The announcement that the justices had granted review in United States v. [read post]
17 May 2020, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
United States Donald Trump’s lawyers have been arguing before New York’s highest court that the president is immune from a defamation lawsuit brought by former “Apprentice” contestant Summer Zervos. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 12:00 am by Mark Meyer
These investigations have to do with what the companies knew about the conditions at their plants and what they did (or chose not do) about it.Furthermore, under the Park Doctrine, any corporate officer who had "authority with respect to the conditions that formed the basis of the alleged violations" can be held liable, United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 4:59 am by Eric Segall
He rightly criticizes the post-1960's judicial fabrication of an injury-in-fact requirement, and he thinks the Court went wrong in the 1970's with cases like United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2024, 6:37 pm by centerforartlaw
”[7] To strip a foreign sovereign of immunity, such suit must involve (1) property taken in violation of international law, and (2)(a) such property must be present in the United States in connection with a commercial activity carried on by the foreign state, or (2)(b) must be possessed by an “agency or instrumentality” of the foreign state that also carries on commercial activity in the United States.[8] When claimants file… [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 11:19 am by Marvin Ammori
Pappert (pdf, pp. 77-79) and its reliance on the Supreme Court decision of United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 12:05 am by Frank Cranmer
Quick links Mateusz Wąsik, Strasbourg Observers: Przybyszewska and Others v. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 8:45 am by Eric Goldman
Nothing in this section shall be construed to impair the enforcement or limit the application of section 1595 of title 18, United States Code The added language to Section 230(e)(1) and the new Section 230(e)(5) would expose Internet services to countless new enforcement actions by state law enforcement and civil plaintiffs. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 7:23 am by Kent Scheidegger
  Today the United States Supreme Court said yes, 5-3.Justice Kennedy assures us that this exception is a narrow one. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 6:17 pm by Larry
In 1989, with torches and pitchforks, Congress chased the Tariff Schedule of the United States away from our black and white villages, never to be seen again. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 6:21 am by Eliot Kim
United States During a teleconference briefing last week, Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Southeast Asia Patrick Murphy announced that U.S. [read post]