Search for: "HALE v. STATE" Results 881 - 900 of 1,080
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2014, 3:09 pm by Giles Peaker
Baroness Hale gave the leading speech, with which the other members of the Appellate Committee agreed. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 2:08 pm by Eric Goldman
Therefore, Viatek has not stated a claim for unfair competition under the Lanham Act and this counterclaim is dismissed. * Sussman-Automatic Corp. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 4:16 pm by Jag
John Catt has indicated that he will take the case to the European Court of Human Rights – historically the court has been far stricter on the requirement of accordance with the law and therefore far less willing to allow the state wide discretionary powers where privacy and surveillance are concerned, resulting in a series of rulings against the UK – see Malone v UK (1984), Hewitt v UK (1992), Liberty & Others v UK (2008), S &… [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 8:28 pm by Joseph L. Hyde
Dancy, 83 N.C. 608, 609 (1880) (quoting 1 Hale’s P.C. 628); accord State v. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
EU member states have rejected a draft of the ePrivacy Regulation. [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 5:10 pm by INFORRM
Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings in media law cases are outstanding: ZXC v Bloomberg, heard 3 and 4 March 2020 (Underhill, Bean and Simon LJJ) Hayden v Associated Newspapers, heard 3 March 2020 (Julian Knowles  J) Sube v News Group Newspapers, heard 4 to 7 February 2020 (Warby J) Various Claimants v MGN, heard, 28 to 31 January 2020 (Mann J) W M Morrison Supermarkets plc v Various… [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 12:14 pm
Nokia v Apple â€" With FRANDS like these who needs enemies? [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 8:52 am by Haley Proctor
Last week. the Supreme Court held that a former employee could hale it into Pennsylvania court on force of Norfolk Southern’s registration to do business in that State. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 5:53 pm by Jeff Welty
There is little section 1983 case law concerning inter-agency intervention, but the Fifth Circuit ruled in Hale v. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 12:31 am by INFORRM
” In assessing the adequacy of these redaction, the Court of Appeal considered this point from the judgment of Baroness Hale in ZH (Tanzania) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2011] UKSC 4): “In making the proportionality assessment under article 8, the best interests of the child must be a primary consideration. [read post]