Search for: "HUGHES v. STATE" Results 881 - 900 of 1,785
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2020, 12:30 am by Sophie Corke
| Keeping up with Dutch patent litigation: Half-year case law review 2020 | Beijing IP Court: let’s talk about short video copyrights | Rick Ross wins legal beef with 50 Cent: the Second Circuit holds that 50 Cent's Publicity Right claim is preempted by the Copyright Act | Copyright, Trademark, International IP, and Trespass: Imapizza LLC v. [read post]
2 Mar 2024, 1:04 pm by Orin S. Kerr
This is the same mistake that the initial Fifth Circuit panel made in United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 8:47 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Justin Hughes: Isn’t an easy solution to allow consumer to sue under qui tam provisions where the state AG could do so? [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 9:00 am by P. Andrew Torrez
We’ve previously discussed the Illinois appellate court’s 2013 decision in Fifield v. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
  This is why, for example, testing a defendant’s white powder to see whether it is cocaine invades no reasonable expectation of privacy, under United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 4:30 am by Eric Segall
In this case, which years later Chief Justice Hughes called a "self-inflicted wound," the Court held that Black people were not and could not be citizens of the United States, and that Congress could not end slavery in the territories. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:30 am by Terry Hart
Justices Leave Door Open to Discovery Rule Copyright Damages — Bloomberg Law’s Kyle Jahner writes about yesterday’s Supreme Court decision in Warner Chappell Music v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 12:49 pm by Lawrence Solum
United States) harkened back to Chief Justice Marshall's approach in Marbury v. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 1:01 pm by Lawrence Solum
United States) harkened back to Chief Justice Marshall's approach in Marbury v. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 8:52 am by Lyle Denniston
Although the two cases (which were consolidated for oral argument and decision) involve a Maryland subsidy plan, New Jersey has a similar one, which will also be affected by the Court’s ruling in Hughes v. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Edwards on behalf of the late Arthur Watkins v Hugh James Ford Simey Solicitors, heard 25 Jul 2019. [read post]