Search for: "In Interest of Ac"
Results 881 - 900
of 2,067
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2010, 10:38 am
For the court to impose its own view of what is fair upon the situation in which the parties find themselves would be to return to the days before Pettitt v Pettitt [1970] AC 777 without even the fig leaf of section 17 of the 1882 Act. 62. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 1:00 am
The judgment throws an interesting light on the concept of justiciability and what will fall within the purview of the court and why. [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 9:30 am
Interested in "Practical Pointers in Respect to Non-compete Agreements in China"? [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 6:25 pm
The fact that an item is not flagged in ACE or elsewhere as within the scope of an order does not mean it cannot actually be within the scope of the order.More to follow on this and related issues. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 9:43 am
We've found that every Texas lawyer has an interesting story. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 8:39 am
§ 284, together with prejudgment interest from the date the infringement began; and an award to CleanTech of all remedies available under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 7:47 pm
Ford smartly pointed out that while a post-entry NAFTA claim under 19 USC 1520(d) requires a certificate of origin, an equally post-entry claim made via the ACS Reconciliation Prototype does not. [read post]
4 Jun 2022, 5:02 pm
ACE USA, 418 N.J. [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 8:08 am
NO Felony ACs on any third degree felony. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 11:41 am
§ 284, together with prejudgment interest from the date the infringement began; and an award to CleanTech of all remedies available under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 6:02 am
” After the IME, your attorney will be interested in knowing exactly what went on in the examination. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 5:01 am
It wasn’t the word “professor’s” but the quote that triggered my interest. [read post]
26 Dec 2024, 11:55 am
Since I love live music, I just don't go out to see my favorites, I see anything remotely interesting. [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 4:08 pm
It was conceded by the claimant in the Naomi Campbell case that it was in the “public interest” to set the record straight about her false public statements about drug-taking (See Campbell v MGN [2004] 2 AC 457 at [24], [58] and [151]). [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 5:06 pm
Steven Pearlstein offered this interesting, though wrong-headed, perspective: In an article last year in The American Interest, Philip Auerswald and Zoltan Acs of George Mason University suggested that the defining characteristic of American capitalism is not only an entrepreneurial culture that generates great wealth but also a philanthropic infrastructure that recycles that wealth in ways that create more opportunity, more growth and more wealth. [read post]
29 Sep 2022, 10:05 pm
Interesting suggestion: [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 4:09 pm
When a public authority is involved it must demonstrate that the use or disclosure which it seeks to restrain would be harmful to the public interest (see the “Spycatcher” case, [1990] 1 AC 109, 258, 270 & 283). [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 5:21 pm
Judgment shall be pronounced publicly but the press and public may be excluded from all or part of the trial in the interests of morals, public order or national security in a democratic society, where the interests of juveniles or the protection of the private life of the parties so require, or to the extent strictly necessary in the opinion of the court in special circumstances where publicity would prejudice the interests of justice. [read post]
19 May 2011, 9:34 pm
Under the Court’s new standard, an Article III case or controversy exists when “the facts alleged, under all the circumstances, show that there is a substantial controversy, between parties having adverse legal interests, of sufficient immediacy and reality to warrant the issuance of a declaratory judgment. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 11:36 am
") I also don’t see how it benefits society if judges couldn’t even attend, or were afraid to attend, say, a dinner put on by ACS, the Brennan Center, the Federalist Society, etc. [read post]
