Search for: "Judicial Standards Commission Rules" Results 881 - 900 of 3,136
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2020, 9:02 pm by Joanna L. Grossman and Deborah L. Brake
This, the Court held, is a type of sex discrimination—requiring a woman to conform to feminine standards for appearance and behavior. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 7:11 am by INFORRM
The Supreme Court ruled that COPA’s reliance on community standards to determine if material is harmful to minors did not by itself make the act overbroad. [read post]
20 Jun 2020, 1:11 pm
  As a result society is organized to maximize the effects of an iterative process through which the individual is disciplined and perfected through a constant measurement, an eternal assessment, against the standards of perfection to be realized by the perfect internalization of the ideological system received. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 1:12 am by Michael Douglas
They may be expressed as service of suit clauses… They may provide for arbitration… They may be standard form… They may be bespoke… They may be asymmetric… They may and often will be coupled with choice of law clauses… They may be multi-tiered, providing first for a process of mediation, whether informal or formal, or informal and then formal, before providing for arbitral or judicial dispute resolution… Dispute resolution clauses… [read post]
Though in some respects the Commission was initially modeled after the NLRB, the same judicial deference to expertise  has not been provided. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 10:51 pm by Jamie Markham
Therefore, the evidentiary rules of the original RJA must apply to pre-amendment filings like Mr. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 10:13 am by Schachtman
Furthermore, a showing of perjury would reduce any judicial concern that the litigation would chill legitimate expert witness opinion testimony, especially in novel contexts. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 4:00 am by Charles Duan, Jeffrey Westling
To give more leeway to rule-breakers and purveyors of misinformation? [read post]
29 May 2020, 6:10 am by Shannon O'Hare
Both the Bund and Länder have executive, legislative and judicial powers. [read post]
26 May 2020, 8:02 am
陳弘毅談國安法爭議: 以香港為家的我們的心聲Over the course of the last year, I have been closely following the writing of Chen Hongyi (陳弘毅), an eminent global academic and constitutional scholar. [read post]
21 May 2020, 8:17 am by Florian Mueller
ZTE standard-essential patent (SEP) injunction decision had been erroneous for several years. [read post]
15 May 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
In a sharply worded letter, the senators said they supported a proposal by a judicial ethics panel that would ban membership among judges in the conservative legal group. [read post]
14 May 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Instead, most all classifications (grounds for differentiation or discrimination, that is) are subject to a very lenient, minimum rationality standard of review (which most people view as a virtual rubber stamp of the legislation) . [read post]
13 May 2020, 6:20 am by Charlotte Butash, Hilary Hurd
She warns that a tremendous separation of powers problem would arise from imposing a higher standard or clear statement rule on a congressional committee investigation. [read post]
12 May 2020, 3:53 am by CMS
THE COURT OF APPEAL’S JUDGMENT Before hearing any substantive appeal, the Court of Appeal had to rule on whether or not it had jurisdiction to hear any appeal or whether, as Mastercard contended, Mr Merricks’ only recourse to challenge the refusal to grant a CPO was in judicial review. [read post]
11 May 2020, 2:13 pm by Elliot Setzer
.: The Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee will hold a videoconference on the Cyberspace Solarium Commission report. [read post]
11 May 2020, 8:07 am by Dan Maurer
These include selecting the panel members (roughly equal to a civilian jury), from within the chain of command (all of whom would be junior in rank to this convening authority), as well as an authority to dismiss or withdrawal charges (Rules for Courts-Martial [R.C.M.] 401(c)(1) and 604(a)) before or during trial, to approve or reject offers to plead guilty (R.C.M. 705), and to approve expert witnesses requested by the defense and fund witness travel (R.C.M. 703). [read post]
4 May 2020, 4:46 pm by INFORRM
What the GC et al decision does do is suggest an immediate and positive way forward for substantive data protection at a policy and not just judicial level. [read post]
4 May 2020, 9:33 am by William Ford, Elliot Setzer
.: The Senate Armed Services Committee will hold a hearing on the Defense Department's spectrum policy and the impact of the Federal Communications Commission's Ligado decision on national security. [read post]