Search for: "Mark May"
Results 881 - 900
of 64,926
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2014, 2:46 am
This is not to say that the brand holder may not have suffered harm. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 3:58 am
If there are no genuine issues of material fact, judgment may be entered. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 3:46 am
The Board may consider arguments regarding the strength of the registered mark, but as to the purported location involved - a hiking trail in Pennsylvania - there was no evidence that consumers (other than locals) would be aware of this geographical connection. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 5:59 am
As to conceptual strength, third-party registrations may show that a portion of a mark is "descriptive, suggestive, or so commonly used that the public will look to other elements to distinguish the source of the goods or services. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 9:40 am
Weight Watchers fears that this may confuse consumers into thinking that it has endorsed Nestle's products. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 2:09 pm
The Board found that Lizzo popularized and elevated 100% THAT BITCH from what may have been a lesser-known phrase to a more memorable status. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 2:09 pm
The Board found that Lizzo popularized and elevated 100% THAT BITCH from what may have been a lesser-known phrase to a more memorable status. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 11:32 pm
Although a consumer may be reminded of the earlier trade marks [owned by HBO], it would only amount to mere association, not indirect confusion. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 2:37 pm
(D2008-1640) recently ruled found that the phrase “officialsite” in a domain name may increase the likelihood of confusion. [read post]
8 May 2008, 4:07 am
In re Vicki Roberts, Serial No. 76649075 (may 2, 2008) [precedential].The Board observed that Applicant's specimens did not show use of irestmycase per se. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 9:00 am
We have a nice student post today on the motion filed by Mark Cuban for attorneys fees against the Commission alleging bad faith in connection with the investigation. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 6:00 am
One simple answer is not to use BMDs at all: let voters mark their optical-scan paper ballots with a pen (that is, HMPB: hand-marked paper ballots). [read post]
13 Feb 2010, 8:00 am
” In Section 10(b), a duty of trust or confidence may arise by agreement, and an agreement to maintain confidential information includes an agreement not to trade. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 8:44 am
Yet, the rights conferred by a trade mark may be limited, for instance when the proprietor faces an earlier right applying in a particular locality. [read post]
3 Jun 2017, 4:05 pm
They may be cited, however, for persuasive value under Fed.R.App.P. 32.1 and 10th Cir.R. 32.1. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 2:46 pm
NL further argued that, because use of the NATURAL LEAF CBD mark is legal under Colorado law, the mark comports will all requirements for federal registration. [read post]
31 May 2007, 5:15 am
Lowry maintained that the supposed mark is a non-distinctive background design that does not function as a mark. [read post]
30 Aug 2015, 2:33 am
He must prove that only the trade mark in respect of which registration is sought, as opposed to any other trade marks which may also be present, indicates, without any possibility of confusion, the exclusive origin of the goods or services concerned. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 12:02 pm
Typically, a company that marks a patent number may believe its product is covered by the patent. [read post]
29 May 2007, 9:50 pm
[Mark Godsey]... [read post]
