Search for: "Mark Smith v. State" Results 881 - 900 of 1,450
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Smith and hold that any substantial burden on religion should trigger strict scrutiny under the First Amendment. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 6:25 am by Conor McEvily
United States, involving the federal harmless error rule, and Reichle v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 12:24 pm by Erin Miller
In a separate opinion respecting the denial of certiorari in Smith v. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 1:25 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Stated otherwise, the duty imposed upon a municipality when it undertakes to act in loco parentis is nondelegable (see Bartels v County of Westchester, 76 AD2d 517, 523). [read post]
18 May 2016, 8:19 am by Dennis Crouch
 Professor Mark Lemley’s brief on behalf of Newegg asks that the attorney-fee framework of Octane Fitness actually be implemented. [read post]
6 Aug 2024, 6:10 am by Norman L. Eisen
’” Op. at 14 (quoting, in part, the test in Nixon v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 7:59 am
The first Improver question was marked as "generally satisfactory". [read post]
14 Jan 2025, 12:00 pm by Guest Blogger
While accepting that there has been a shift from color-blind v. race-conscious to protect v. repair, Fleming and McClain  query how “fundamental” this change is. [read post]