Search for: "Marks v. State "
Results 881 - 900
of 21,678
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2016, 8:17 am
Supreme Court case Miranda v. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
Dist. v Yonkers Fedn. of Teachers, 180 AD3d 1041, 1042 [2020] [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
Dist. v Yonkers Fedn. of Teachers, 180 AD3d 1041, 1042 [2020] [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 8:02 am
Garland v. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 8:02 am
Garland v. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 8:02 am
Garland v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 8:39 am
Miller v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 1:00 am
Jim Jordan compelling Mark Pomerantz to testify before Congress? [read post]
4 May 2023, 1:00 am
Jim Jordan compelling Mark Pomerantz to testify before Congress? [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 9:32 am
State v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 8:36 am
Zynga Game Network, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 8:47 am
As I’ll show, United States v. [read post]
5 May 2022, 4:25 am
Lodestar Anstalt v. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 5:40 am
V V sought to register the following trade mark in Singapore (the “V V Mark”): However, its application was opposed by Twitter, which relied on its prior registration for the following mark (the “Twitter Mark”). [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 8:17 am
Well, Bulgaria is in the EU and an EUTM can be blocked from registration by a national mark from any EU Member State. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 7:20 am
" Unique Product Solutions, Limited v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 1:40 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 1:03 pm
The first of these is GO Outdoors Ltd v Skechers USA Inc II [2015] EWHC 1405 (Ch), a 19 May decision of Mrs Justice Rose, sitting in the Chancery Division, England and Wales, on an appeal from a decision of the UK Intellectual Property Office. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 5:01 am
From New York trial judge Ariel Chesler's opinion last month in Z.U. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 3:26 am
it may — depending on the specific mark which is described as enjoying a reputation and, accordingly, on the public concerned — be sufficient that a Community trade mark enjoys a reputation in one Member State, which does not need to be the State in which that provision is relied upon. [read post]
