Search for: "POTTER v. POTTER"
Results 881 - 900
of 964
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Aug 2024, 8:10 am
We can start with a result that seems startling, the case of the emotional support parrots.(4) United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm
” In Brown, and then emphatically in Loving v. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 2:12 am
(Techdirt) Halliburton tries to patent form of patent trolling (Techdirt) (I/P Updates)(Law360) From 15 September, committing any crime can result in revocation of ‘privilege’ to prosecute before USPTO (Patent Prospector) USPTO to increase PCT transmittal and search fees (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Law360) US Patents – Decisions Questions of fact re alleged enjoined imitations prevent contempt: Liquid Dynamics Corp v Vaughan (Chicago Intellectual… [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 4:30 am
About eight years ago I published a document called The Rights and Responsibilities of Self-Represented Litigants that took rights-based approach to the role of litigants within the justice system and the expectations they should have as to how they will be treated. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 1:44 pm
La disidencia de Potter Stewart se centró en negar la premisa de que fuera posible decir que había un acto judicial. [read post]
14 May 2019, 9:27 am
” If you misspell Harry Potter’s name—or put it in kanji—we’ve got you covered. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 7:43 am
There are pockets that demand different approaches.Jake Linford: Error costs v. administrative costs. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
: G-Star v Pepsico (Class 46) Nigeria Nigeria celebrates 20 years of copyright law (Afro-IP) Poland Confusion around ARENDA (Class 46) Inspiration or plagiarism? [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
: (Patent Docs), US: Supreme Court declines to hear final Nucleonics’ appeal in gene-silencing patent dispute with Benitec Australia: (IP Law360), (Therapeutics Daily), US: 505(b)(2) drug approvals rock - Interaction of patents and exclusivity of drugs approved by FDA under section 505(b)(2): (Patent Baristas), US: StemCells’ patents survive reexam – StemCells and Neuralstem differ on extent of changes: (Patent Docs), US: StemCells announces issuance of… [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
Good afternoon. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 9:17 am
In the case of Qualitex Co. v. [read post]
17 May 2013, 1:05 pm
In McBurney v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 9:09 am
[See pp. 165-204, on Vásquez.] [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 4:36 pm
This has been established law since the decision in Clayton v Clayton [2006] EWCA Civ 878; [2007] 1 FLR. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 8:13 am
Potter Stewart’s 1959 confirmation hearing is a case in point. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 5:08 am
So, from Goodyear v. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
Protecting computer programs under the Copyright Act: Dais Studios v Bullet Creative: (IP Down Under), Assessing copyright risk in new classroom technologies: (IP Down Under), Cadbury loses battle over exclusive use of colour purple for chocolate wrapping in its case against Darrell Lea: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), (IP Down Under), (IPKat), (IPwar’s), Employee or independent contractor? [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Landmark IP implications for universities: University of Western Australia v Gray: (IPRoo), (Managing Intellectual Property), (The Age), The latest edition of US Trade Representative’s ‘Special 301 Report’: (Ars Technica), (Ars Technica), (IAM), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Patent Docs), (IP Law360), Court rejects RIAA ‘making available’ theory: Atlantic v Howell:… [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 9:01 pm
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 5:06 pm
This is the first part of a multi-part series on the Pros and Cons of Commercial Irradiation of Fresh Iceberg Lettuce and Fresh Spinach. [read post]
