Search for: "People v. Connors" Results 881 - 900 of 1,127
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2011, 6:33 am by Fiona de Londras
Possible relevance for Ireland Our Housing Act 1966 bears striking resemblance to the 1996 Act in the UK, especially inasmuch as a District Court judge is required (“shall”, s. 62; Dublin Corporation v. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 1:24 pm by NL
She argued that Article 8 imposed on the State a positive obligation to facilitate the gypsy way of life (Chapman v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 27238/95, BAILII: [2001] ECHR 43, ECHR 2001 I and Connors v. the United Kingdom, no. 66746/01, BAILII: [2004] ECHR 223, 27 May 2004) and in granting such a wide-ranging injunction the authorities were acting in violation of this obligation. 21. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 2:27 am by Fiona de Londras
I blogged about that conference and the Declaration that emerged briefly at the time, and indeed Alastair Mowbray has produced a really excellent overview of both for the Human Rights Law Review which people with access to Oxford Journals can download here. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 3:45 am by Russ Bensing
Richter and Premo v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 4:09 am by Lisa McElroy
”   According to Justice O’Connor, “[I]n terms of having the American people look at the court and think of it as being fair and appropriate for our nation, it helps to have women, plural, on the court. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 8:04 am by J
After her death, it transpired that Mrs YB had made two further wills, leaving the flat to other people. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 6:08 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Writing for Carroll O'Connor, who had #1 parking spot. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 11:09 am by Michael C. Smith
  I treasured our time together on the back cover of O'Connor's because I always hoped that people might think I was smarter than I actually am because my picture was next to his, and everybody knew how brilliant Greg was. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 7:30 am by Transplanted Lawyer
Donnelly (1984) 465 U.S. 668, O'Connor, J., concurring) the issue of whether Measure 755 violates the Establishment Clause is a slam dunk. [read post]