Search for: "People v. Finely" Results 881 - 900 of 5,637
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2018, 9:30 am by Hanlon Law, PA
That includes a 1993 decision by the Fifth District Court of Appeal in Cooper v. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 1:49 pm by Eugene Volokh
The only reasoned decisions I could find, the nonprecedential National Socialist White People's Party v. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 10:00 pm by Dan Flynn
They have been invited to the likely final hearing for United States of America v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 2:38 pm by Eugene Volokh
But I just ran across an excellent example that I hadn’t found when doing research on that case, State v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 4:20 am by Gary L. Francione
In fact, I have explicitly asked People for the Ethical Treatment a dozen times on Twitter whether PETA considers Animal Compassionate products to be “humanely” produced and PETA has refused to answer. [read post]
31 May 2008, 11:24 am
The Fort Wayne Journal Gazette has a brief report today on Thursday's COA NFP decision in the case of Hostetler v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 2:07 pm
Not the lawyer's desire for fame.It's clear that Allred does a fine job of getting her mug in the news, and therefore she probably gets cases as a result. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Town of Greece v. [read post]
11 May 2012, 4:23 am by Patrick Quinlan
The people who founded our country, and those who then wrote the Florida Constitution, were very afraid of some small group of people gaining too much power and using that power to control our government and the fate of We the People. [read post]
11 May 2012, 4:23 am by Patrick Quinlan
The people who founded our country, and those who then wrote the Florida Constitution, were very afraid of some small group of people gaining too much power and using that power to control our government and the fate of We the People. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 6:51 pm by Donald Thompson
 The proscription in the title or this post is slightly more limited (federal agents) and based not on the Constitution, but on a particular federal statute: 18 USC § 1001.In New York, for example, the police are permitted to lie to you (“we got your fingerprints on the murder weapon,” “we've got a video of you leaving the 7-11,” “your codefendant is saying it was all you, he didn’t do anything,”) in order to get you to tell the truth, so long… [read post]