Search for: "Reach v. State" Results 881 - 900 of 37,338
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2011, 9:21 am by Amy Burns
The Court explains that one cannot, unless there is a mistake, intend to prevent something that had no chance of happening anyway; moreover, if the statute did not require any showing of ties to federal officials, it would sweep a large amount of tampering in purely state investigations under its reach. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 5:53 am by Gerard Magliocca
 Today I think we would say that a state law that was interpreted to act with broad extraterritorial reach runs afoul of the Dormant Commerce Clause. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 9:11 am by Martha Minow
Because Brown v Board of Education made "separate but equal" unconstitutional and inadequate, it's tempting to use the phrase to challenge domestic partnerships in states that ban same-sex marriage. [read post]
8 Dec 2019, 9:15 am by Steve Brachmann
The appeal reached the Supreme Court, where it was remanded in June 2016 in light of Cuozzo Speed Technologies v. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
To come back to the IPT, it applies the rulings in the judgement by the European Court of Human Right in Weber & Saravia v Germany [2008] and Kennedy v United Kingdom [2011] to solve issues 2 and 3 (Mention is also made of R E v United Kingdom [2016] and Szabo & Vissy v Hungary). [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 9:53 am by Jon Sands
[Ed. note -- Sorry for the delay; Jon and I were both out late last week.]United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 12:01 pm by dbmadmin
On June 27th, 2012, the 7th Circuit established elements extending the reach of United States antitrust law to certain cases where foreign companies engage in anticompetitive conduct outside the United States. [read post]
4 May 2016, 4:15 am by Gene Quinn
On Monday, April 25, 2016, the United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Cuozzo Speed Technologies v. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 8:04 am
On Tuesday (3/1/2008), the Governor of Virginia, Tim Kaine, announced a stay of excecution for Edward Bell, who was scheduled to be executed on April 8, and declared a moratorium on every execution in the state until the United States Supreme Court reaches a verdict in the case of Baze v. [read post]