Search for: "Reade v. C. I. R" Results 881 - 900 of 2,891
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2010, 6:13 am by Maxwell Kennerly
Frankly, reading through the post, I can't help but wonder if Beck et al. indeed have some "ulterior motive" in misrepresenting how defense lawyers use Ashcroft v. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 11:50 am by Wolfgang Demino
The majority opinion "assumes arguendo" this point, but every circuit that has considered the issue has held that foreclosure-related conduct, particularly demand letters that anticipate foreclosure proceedings, can constitute debt collection and therefore can—if false, misleading, deceptive, or unfair—violate the FDCPA.[2]Second, as I read Texas law, part of the debts the Attorney Defendants tried to collect here were in fact time-barred from foreclosure. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 12:26 am by Tessa Shepperson
In particular I’m not very happy with the items I have for the letters B, C, M, O, U, V, X and Z (with the real problem ones being X and Z). [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 7:08 pm
That was the question facing the court in California Dept. of Water v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 3:00 am by Terry Hart
” It’s an interesting post, worth a read, and it got me thinking. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 8:34 am by Jim Gerl
I hope that all of the different types of special education stakeholders who read this blog find the information in this series helpful. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 6:34 am by Juan AntĂșnez
Rocco, — So.3d —-, 2013 WL 3155849 (Fla. 1st DCA June 24, 2013), which I wrote about here. [read post]