Search for: "Robert C Smith" Results 881 - 900 of 1,021
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2023, 10:08 am by David Kopel
Greener, The Gun and Its Development 66-67 (9th ed. 1910); Charles C. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 1:33 pm by Eugene Volokh
Robert Welch, Inc. (1974), private-figure plaintiffs—as plaintiffs here are likely to be—only have to show negligence to recover proven compensatory damages (including identifiable business losses as well as emotional distress damages). [read post]
15 May 2022, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
The Guardian covers the ongoing defamation trial between ex-soldier Ben Roberts Smith and the Age, Canberra Times and SMH over allegations made by the publications that he is guilty of committing war crimes in Afghanistan. [read post]
19 Aug 2023, 4:49 pm by Eugene Volokh
Robert Welch, Inc. (1974), private-figure plaintiffs—as plaintiffs here are likely to be—only have to show negligence to recover proven compensatory damages (including identifiable business losses as well as emotional distress damages). [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 5:13 pm by INFORRM
Newspapers Journalism and Regulation On 7 March 2022, Ofcom ruled that BBC News at Six breached the accuracy standard set by the Broadcasting Code on 26 February 2021 with Scotland editor Sarah Smith’s statement that: “Alex Salmond said he believes Nicola Sturgeon has misled Parliament and broken the Ministerial Code, which he thinks means she should resign. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 4:38 pm by Bill Marler
Work by these leaders has nearly eliminated some pathogens such as botulism, made significant reductions in others and kept the spotlight and focus in the public and C-suite on food safety. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 4:01 pm
., Cleveland Law Firm, LLC 1816 Tin Valley Circle, Suite C Birmingham, Alabama 35235 Office: 205.453.4702 Cellular: 205.516.3579 Facsimile: 205.419.0704 Email: cbcleveland@hotmail.com*Hill, Jr., W. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 10:54 am by Michael Froomkin
This must be accompanied by a clearly displayed disclaimer that the information or photographs do not imply official endorsement; c. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 12:16 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  According to professors Christine Hurt and Paul Stancil of the Brigham Young University Law School, “[c]ourts have not uniformly concluded whether short sellers can prove loss causation,” and they conclude that “short sellers should not benefit from the Basic presumption; therefore, their inclusion in any prospective class of typical traders should jeopardize class certification. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 4:29 am by centerforartlaw
By Natalie Glitz Grumhaus There are many reasons that a nonprofit foundation may feel the need to dissolve.[1] When James and Charlotte Brooks Foundation decided to fully dissolve in 2015, only five years after its founding in 2010, they donated most of the Brooks’ artwork to a local art museum, the Parrish, as a way to further the Foundation’s purpose as an artist-endowed institution, dedicated to the Long Island arts community.[2] Another organization, the Urban Institute of… [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 10:54 am by Michael Froomkin
This must be accompanied by a clearly displayed disclaimer that the information or photographs do not imply official endorsement; c. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 2:13 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
LexisNexis has selected some of the top “noteworthy” panel decisions issued by the California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board during the period July through December 2023. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 5:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Key Findings Allowing companies to fully and immediately deduct investments in structures is one of the most cost-efficient ways lawmakers can stimulate investment, create jobs, and boost GDP during a post-pandemic recovery. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 5:01 am by Jonathan Shaub
Editor's Note: Pursuant to a FOIA settlement, the Knight Institute recently received a set of previously undisclosed OLC memoranda related to executive privilege. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:26 pm
U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals, January 19, 2010 Smith v. [read post]