Search for: "STATE IN THE INTEREST OF J. L." Results 881 - 900 of 3,970
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jan 2021, 4:00 am by Deanne Sowter
One of their purposes is to help the parties design settlement options that meet their interests. [read post]
5 Jan 2021, 12:00 pm by Alka Bahal
Specifically, the suspension in P.P. 10052 applies to applicants for H-1B, H2B, and L-1 visas; J-1 visa applicants participating in the intern, trainee, teacher, camp counselor, au pair, or summer work travel programs; and any spouses or children of covered applicants applying for H-4, L-2, or J-2 visas. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 4:13 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
Those whose entry is in the national interest may be eligible to receive an interview despite these Proclamations if they can meet the criteria for the national interest exception. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 3:15 pm by Cornerstone Law Group
Proclamation 10052 went into effect on June 24 and limits the entry of non-immigrants on H-1B, H-2B, L, and most J visas, and their spouses or children. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 2:16 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
Government Any alien whose entry would be in the national interest of the United States (national interest waivers) Aliens seeking entry for asylum, refugee status, withholding of removal, or protection under the Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment Proclamation 10052 Just as P.P. 10014 was set to expire on June 22, 2020, the President issued P.P. 10052 which (1) extended P.P. 10014 until December 31, 2020 and (2)… [read post]
3 Jan 2021, 5:13 am by SHG
The court initially describes the compelling state interest in proscribing the core conduct that the statute is directed to prohibit. [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 2:30 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
This new proclamation (1) extended P.P. 10014 until December 31, 2020 and (2) added new limits on visa issuance and entry for H-1B, H-2B, J, and L nonimmigrants workers due to their “risk of displacing and disadvantaging U.S. workers during the Coronavirus pandemic. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 7:55 am by Bob Ambrogi
In a historic vote in August, the Utah Supreme Court approved sweeping changes in legal services regulation in that state. [read post]
29 Dec 2020, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
March 16, 2020 Bowes, J., Olson, J., Stabile, J.) [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
In Wafic Said v Group L’Express (2018) it was held that a claimant could have only one centre of interests, and it was found on the facts that the claimant’s extensive personal connections with England were not sufficient to displace the presumption that his place of habitual residence, Monaco, was the centre of his interests. [read post]
24 Dec 2020, 8:30 pm by Jim Sedor
Some policy experts fear the competition for vaccines will favor the wealthiest companies with the strongest lobbying teams in state capitals. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 2:33 pm by Joel R. Brandes
In his affidavit, the husband stated that he “never engaged in a sexual relationship of any kind or nature with” R.L, and that R.L. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 12:30 pm by Giles Peaker
L&Q threatened possession proceedings but only gave Ms J priority on a transfer, which may have taken years to come about. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 11:10 pm by Josh Blackman
And, when the interests of parenthood are combined with a free exercise claim of the nature revealed by this record, more than merely a 'reasonable relation to some purpose within the competency of the State' is required to sustain the validity of the State's requirement under the First Amendment. [read post]