Search for: "STATE v. SULLIVAN"
Results 881 - 900
of 2,475
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2007, 11:21 am
CRONE, J. concurs SULLIVAN, J. concurs in resultNFP criminal opinions today (12): Shannon Parker v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 2:28 pm
Sullivan. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 3:03 pm
Defense trial counsel were Wade Manor and Andy Clark with the Scott Sullivan law firm in Ridgeland. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 12:15 pm
On April 12, 2022, Judge Claire V. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 3:47 am
However, the recent Second Circuit opinion, Sullivan-Mestecky v. [read post]
13 May 2008, 2:41 pm
Boehm, J., dissents with opinion.In State of Indiana v. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 4:16 pm
Kelvin Rutledge, again rather valiantly, submitted an argument drawing on certain sentences from the judgments in Hammersmith & Fulham v Monk and Crawley BC v Ure but these cases involved joint tenants and were not relevant to this issue. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 8:02 pm
In United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 4:27 pm
The court cited approvingly the recent 2d Circuit opinion in Sullivan-Mestecky v. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 2:30 pm
" (Steve Korris, "Davis lectures Starcher in insurance opinion", Aug. 16; Strahin v. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 5:39 am
State v. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 4:00 am
Accordingly, said the court, this case was governed by the rule of New York Times Co. v Sullivan, 376 US 254, in which the Supreme Court of the United States interpreted the First Amendment to the United States Constitution as embodying "the principle that debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide-open, and that it may well include vehement, caustic, and sometimes unpleasantly sharp attacks on government and public officials. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 4:11 pm
Oral arguments were heard yesterday by the Supreme Court in the "robo-call" case, State of Indiana v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 7:41 pm
Gottfried, United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 7:24 pm
Gottfried, United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 12:12 pm
" The Second Circuit says the state regulation is legal and does not deny the students their rights under federal law.The case is Bryant v. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 7:50 am
Sullivan. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 5:17 am
Sullivan in his blog and later by the New York Times. . . . [read post]
3 Jun 2023, 4:14 pm
Since the United States Supreme Court’s landmark decision in New York Times v Sullivan in 1964, it has been extremely difficult for plaintiffs with any public profile to sue for defamation in the United States. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 4:00 am
Removal of a public officer from his or her officeKalodukas v Berentsen, 2014 NY Slip Op 07406, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentGlenda Kalodukas and other citizen residents of the Village of Bloomingburg in Sullivan County [Kalodukas], filed a petition in the Appellate Division pursuant to Public Officers Law §36* seeking to have the Appellate Division remove Mark Berentsen from his position of Mayor of the Village, alleging, among other things, that he violated General… [read post]
