Search for: "STEVEN LITTLE" Results 881 - 900 of 4,294
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2018, 2:22 pm by Schachtman
A silly little methyl group on a complicated hydrocarbon ring structure can make a world of difference, as in the difference between estrogen and testosterone. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 6:00 am by Jack Goldsmith, Robert D. Williams
 The continuance of massive theft by China and other countries with little penalty shows that the norm simply does not exist. [read post]
26 Dec 2018, 5:31 am by Gritsforbreakfast
But there's little doubt we'll see more bite-mark-based convictions overturned now that Chaney has discredited such evidence.And there are broader implications. [read post]
25 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm by Series of Essays
That says more about how little else the President has accomplished, because so far the Administration has made only the tiniest of dents in the existing stock of federal regulation. [read post]
23 Dec 2018, 11:02 am by Steve Kalar
Sanchez after a Section 922(g) conviction.How to Use: Like a Christmas fruit cake, this brief mem dispo is dense with little nuggets (but is far tastier). [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
” Despite the fundamentality of these questions, opinions by US courts provide little guidance.A recent high-profile case reveals yet more uncertainty about the very nature of law in the US. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 3:48 am by SHG
Steven Agee ripped the majority’s exposure of UMW for failure to assert control over the internets. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 3:14 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Section 17(b) of the Securities Act The SEC charged Khaled and Mayweather with violations of Section 17(b) of the Securities Act of 1933 (Section 17(b)), a little-known and rarely used federal statute, enacted a year or so before the SEC was even created. [read post]
16 Dec 2018, 3:16 pm by Steve Kalar
 Image of “batteries not included” from http://christophergamboa.com/tag/clean-eating/Steven Kalar, Federal Public Defender Northern District of California. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 8:57 am by Lindsay See
As early as 1980, for instance, Justice John Paul Stevens called attempts to reconcile the decisions stemming from Lemon as a “Sisyphean task. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 10:03 am by Rick Garnett
” The late Justice Antonin Scalia had pronounced a consonant, but more colorful, conclusion, comparing the so-called “Lemon test” that (some) justices (sometimes) apply in establishment-of-religion cases to a “ghoul in a late night horror movie that repeatedly sits up in its grave and shuffles abroad, after being repeatedly killed and buried,” to frighten little children and attorneys alike. [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 11:52 am by Mayank Varia
To quote Steven Levy, “lawful hacking is techno-capitalism at its shadiest. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 8:40 am by Shane McCall
As my colleague Steven Koprince has astutely observed, the problem might not be that there are too many protests. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 11:07 am by Brad Schnure
Should your proposed constitutional amendment be enacted, however, New Jerseyans will be left with little more than an illusion of choice when they enter the voting booth in future legislative elections. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 11:11 am by Adam Feldman
Suffice it to say, although Supreme Court decisions are far from tenuous, they have very little preclusive effect on the court’s decision-making and instead function as persuasive guidance. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 9:00 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Those regulations must be “consistent with the objectives of” whatever statutes provide federal funding, but that caveat restricts rather than enlarges the ED’s authority under Title IX.One can think that the Obama ED policy on addressing sexual misconduct at Title IX-covered educational institutions was wrong-headed or under-valued the interests of students accused of such misconduct, but there was little doubt that it aimed to “effectuate” Title IX’s… [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm by Schachtman
To be sure, Rothman did target statistical significance as a strict criterion of causal inference, but there is little support in the brief for the loosey-goosey style of causal claiming that is so prevalent among lawyers for the litigation industry. [read post]