Search for: "State of Minnesota v. District Court" Results 881 - 900 of 1,678
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2014, 8:43 pm by Jarod Bona
We are proud to announce that we filed an amicus curiae brief with the Minnesota Supreme Court on behalf of the Minnesota Vacation Rental Association last week in Dean et al. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm by Schachtman
More Nonsense on Differential Diagnosis The Supreme Court recently addressed differential etiology in Matrixx Initiatives, in stunningly irrelevant and errant dicta: “We note that courts frequently permit expert testimony on causation based on evidence other than statistical significance. [read post]
27 May 2014, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Last year, when the Supreme Court invalidated Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) in United States v. [read post]
23 May 2014, 10:00 am by Cicely Wilson
The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the State on all counts. [read post]
22 May 2014, 8:40 am by WIMS
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan at Marquette. [read post]
17 May 2014, 4:37 pm
The Supreme Court’s 2005 decision in Kelo v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 8:36 am by WIMS
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions   <> In Defense of Animals v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 6:52 am by Joy Waltemath
After the trial court dismissed her suit, the state Third District Court of Appeal affirmed. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 6:50 am by Joy Waltemath
” However, the Seventh Circuit pointed out that this argument was foreclosed by the Supreme Court’s decision in Minnesota State Board for Community Colleges v Knight. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 1:19 pm by Howard Friedman
Time and again the Supreme Court has reminded lower courts that speculation and conjecture are not injuries cognizable under Article III.However, instead of dismissing the case for lack of standing, the 8th Circuit ordered that the district court return it to the Minnesota state court where it originated before it was removed to federal court under the Class Action Fairness Act. [read post]
29 Mar 2014, 8:50 am by Jake McGowan
Bouncing Angels, Inc., a district court in Minnesota found personal jurisdiction over a defendant company that sold a single (allegedly infringing) inflatable carousel bounce house within the state. [read post]