Search for: "State v. Cornell" Results 881 - 900 of 1,545
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2015, 6:50 am
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg implicitly recognized this point in her opinion for the Court in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 8:30 pm
 So off to Google Scholar (New York state court cases) and the AAA's No-Fault Award Service page I went. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The Supreme Court answered that question in the 1898 case of United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
United States) prohibits such blanket interception. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The Supreme Court case most closely on point is the 1991 ruling in Masson v. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 10:59 am by Tom Kosakowski
 The new policy was prompted in part by an investigation by Department of Education's Office of Civil Rights and a report by the California State Auditor.The policy states in relevant parts:H. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 3:09 pm by Mark Graber
  The chapter on state constitutionalism corresponds to The Federalist’s frequent invocation of “analog[ies] to your own state constitution. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
As Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. prophetically stated in his dissent from the infamous 1905 case of Lochner v. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 5:43 am by Timothy P. Flynn
He then cited to some of the landmark cases involving homosexuality such as Bowers v Hardwick [the 1986 case that upheld Georgia's criminalization of certain homosexual acts]; Lawrence v Texas [the 2003 decision overruling Bowers]; and of course, United States v Windsor [striking down as unconstitutional the federal Defense of Marriage Act which defined a marriage as solely between one man and one woman in the federal benefits context].Justice Roberts'… [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
The standard the City urged for reviewing a facial challenge used language from United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:30 pm by Kali Borkoski
United States, holding that increasing sentences under the residual clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act violates the Constitution, and Obergefell v. [read post]