Search for: "State v. Fees"
Results 881 - 900
of 20,980
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
[S]peaking common pro-life views as part of a pregnancy help ministry, or failing to speak the State’s pro-abortion views on hotly disputed issues, is illegal under state law, on pain of crippling fines, injunctions, and attorney fees. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 4:27 pm
As we have seen time and again across our Governmental Practice teams, companies can help avoid costly penalties, litigation, and legal fees in the face of a government inquiry or investigation by acting early to make informed and honest disclosures, and creating tailored policies and procedures that are diligently followed. 2. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 11:14 am
See, e.g., Snyder v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 8:23 pm
The Court also upheld the trial court’s ruling that the school district did not improperly deposit impact fees into the wrong fund, determining that the state statute authorizing impact fees does not require school impact fees to be deposited into a special fund, just that the fees only be used for proper purposes as set out in the statute. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 9:53 am
During its next term, the United States Supreme Court will review the First Circuit Court of Appeals’s holding in Acheson Hotels, LLC v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 9:53 am
During its next term, the United States Supreme Court will review the First Circuit Court of Appeals’s holding in Acheson Hotels, LLC v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 9:53 am
During its next term, the United States Supreme Court will review the First Circuit Court of Appeals’s holding in Acheson Hotels, LLC v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:03 am
The defendant demurred, stating that it did not have $250 million in legally available funds, i.e., surplus funds within the meaning of Section 513 of the Business Corporation Law. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 3:09 am
” And, in stark contrast to the allegation that defendant’s aim was to squeeze plaintiff for excessive fees, plaintiff testified that it was defendant who, unprompted, initiated the proposal to discount her fees. [read post]
29 Jul 2023, 10:17 am
No, not New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
29 Jul 2023, 8:48 am
Case citation: Davis v. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 7:34 am
Backs Visa, Mastercard ATM Fee Antitrust ClassesLaw360 – July 26, 2023 (subscription required) The D.C. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 6:28 pm
" (Hugh Hall Campbell, KC v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 4:45 pm
Like the Blake legislation, SB 5440 is derived from a court case, Trueblood v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 3:27 pm
The additional two-digit statistical suffix is often (but not always) a compliance afterthought because the suffix does not usually impact duties, taxes, and fees. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 2:06 pm
Woods Tr. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 2:41 pm
The appeals court cited Roman v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 1:45 pm
National Indian Gaming Commission (Fee Land Into Trust; Tribal Gaming Ordinance) Villasenor v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 2:23 am
Odendaal v South African Reserve Bank (2271/2022) [2023] ZAWCHC 160 (6 July 2023) [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 9:29 am
In fact, this is exactly what happened to the interior designer in Tanya M Johnson v. [read post]
