Search for: "State v. Light"
Results 881 - 900
of 25,970
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2008, 2:20 pm
Waldrip v. [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 6:58 pm
The Court, while stating that it was not actually ruling on the issue, expressly doubted that a simple assault committed recklessly could be a crime of violence in light of US v. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 8:47 am
Plaintiff (Carfax) manages information regarding used cars and light trucks. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 2:01 am
In Robathin v Austria, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) scrutinized a search and seizure in a law office in light of article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 8:51 am
Prior to the remedies hearing the USA asked the court if it had the power to order redundancy payments in light of the principles of state immunity, however the court ruled that because the USA had already submitted the appeal and had not pleaded state immunity from the outset, it was unable to consider this submission. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 10:01 am
V. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 11:23 am
The state of play now is as follows: trial will begin at 1500 hours with opening statements on the missing movement offense. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 9:41 am
She filed an amicus brief in support of the state in Trinity Lutheran v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 4:04 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 5:28 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 11:35 am
., and Tiffany & Co. filed a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari appealing the ruling of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. [read post]
29 Sep 2012, 6:35 pm
The District Court for Middle District of Florida considers the issue - often referred to as respondeat superior - in Donaldson v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 10:50 am
As recently as 2015, in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 11:23 am
“[W]when read in light of the Act’s purpose and numerous provisions, the prohibitions are clearly limited to communications directed to the consumer and do not apply to state judges. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 2:22 pm
The New Jersey Supreme Court faced this question in State v. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 5:51 am
Then, the Supreme Court had to get in the act and vacate and remand the case with instructions to reconsider it in light of the Supreme Court's decision in Carey v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 3:42 am
The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit for further consideration in light of Bilski v. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 4:10 am
The CAFC's order (pdf here) states, rather cryptically:The case is remanded for further consideration in light of the Supreme Court’s decision. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 6:27 am
Initially, the leave was supposed to be for three months, but after the winter, her doctor wrote a note to the school stating that she would not be able to return for the remainder of the school year. [read post]
