Search for: "State v. Self"
Results 881 - 900
of 15,805
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2023, 3:15 am
The alert states that approximately 60 banks would currently be covered by the standards — that is, “state-chartered nonmember insured banks, state-licensed insured branches of foreign banks, and state savings associations that have $10 billion or more in total assets. [read post]
12 Oct 2023, 6:30 am
Frederick (2007) and Holder v. [read post]
12 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
The issues are complex, requiring the balancing of competing democratic values: transparency v autonomy; delegation v supervision; objectivity v diversity; tolerance of debate and disagreement v the need to reach some form of functional consensus for collective governance to continue. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 6:54 am
Pinto v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 1:23 am
The PCT application names the three inventors as inventors and as applicants for the United States of America (US) only. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 7:08 am
Suriano v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 2:40 pm
United States. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 5:52 am
Denezpi v. [read post]
8 Oct 2023, 9:05 pm
Robbins, and Kisor v. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 6:07 am
See, e.g., State v. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 4:30 am
Children learn early on in their education that the United States Government is one of separated powers. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
The complaint (full text) in Yarbrough v. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 1:20 am
EU PIL self-determines its scope of application, motivated by European interests. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 9:07 pm
Biden criticized the Supreme Court’s decision in Nebraska v. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 8:19 am
In this way, apartheid’s governance structures are designed to self-perpetuate. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 7:51 am
State v. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 5:01 am
I blogged two weeks ago about Hansen v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 3:02 pm
USA (Bristol Bay Pebble Mine; Clean Water Act; state sovereignty) Four petitions for certiorari were denied on 10/2/2023: Bird Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:54 am
See United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 6:30 am
The appointments process is opaque: the higher judiciary has been, by its own orders, largely self-appointing since 1993, controlling the composition of the courts in secrecy and resisting attempts to reform this process. [read post]
