Search for: "Stillings v. United States of America"
Results 881 - 900
of 2,858
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2023, 4:00 am
Individuals with law degrees occupy roughly half the state governorships, more than half the seats in the United States Senate, and more than a third of the seats in the United States House of Representatives. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 8:50 pm
Additionally, both pre- and post- issuance opposition has long existed for United States trademarks. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 4:21 pm
Douglas, in Doe V. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 4:56 am
Hitselberger has been charged by the United States of America on three counts of violating 18 U.S. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 12:17 pm
In Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
There could, to be sure, still be deprivations of that right, but the state would have to demonstrate a good reason—a “compelling interest”—to do so. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 8:57 am
(Carsey-Werner Company, LLC v. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 3:22 am
Sony Corp. of America v. [read post]
10 May 2007, 1:08 am
See also Markell, Amicus Curiae Brief in Favor of Respondent, Bank of America v. 203 North LaSalle Street Partnership, No. 97-1498, United States Supreme Court, October Term 1997 (filed August 17, 1998).But I'm still in search of another source: I could swear that somewhere in the work of Mr. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 5:00 am
The directive states that, The collection of foreign private commercial information or trade secrets is authorized only to protect the national security of the United States or its partners and allies. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 11:00 am
Leading nineteenth century legal thinkers in the United States shared this view of the suspension clause. [read post]
10 Aug 2008, 8:13 pm
Officers of America, Local 38 v. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 3:44 am
The US Supreme Court’s decision a couple of weeks back in Citizens United v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 5:16 pm
The states that prohibited marriage equality still greatly outnu [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 10:23 am
DotD points to Casey v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 4:30 am
As the Senate Foreign Relations Committee put it: For many years, the United States has embarrassed itself by excluding prominent foreigners from visiting the United States solely because of their political beliefs. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 11:46 am
And after reading about the recent decision by the Second Circuit in Cammeby’s v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 11:46 am
And after reading about the recent decision by the Second Circuit in Cammeby’s v. [read post]
3 Dec 2016, 8:49 pm
Claims are based on reserved rights that are still effective under the treaties, the special trust relationship between the United States and the Tribes that is recognized in U.S. law, the U.S. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 9:20 am
Though the Carter administration signed CEDAW in 1980, the Bush and Reagan administrations opposed it and despite repeated hearings and recommendations from the Senate Foreign Relations Committee for its ratification, the United States is still not a party to the Convention. [read post]
